Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs MCDFX
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs MCDFX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$16.19
Change-$0.17 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.9M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. ICHKX (26.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: MCDFX (2.78) vs ICHKX (0.86). ICHKX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ICHKX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. ICHKX (8.63). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: MCDFX (2500) vs ICHKX (5000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.74 vs. ICHKX (25.68). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. ICHKX (-30.28).
| ICHKX | MCDFX | ICHKX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.080 | 28.884 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9M | 104M | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 2.78 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.68 | 27.74 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.27 | 36.75 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.28 | -3.89 | 778% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.90 | 36.67 | -60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement