Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs MCDFX
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs MCDFX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$16.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.84M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. ICHKX (27.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: MCDFX (2.84) vs ICHKX (0.86). ICHKX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ICHKX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. ICHKX (8.63). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: MCDFX (2500) vs ICHKX (5000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. ICHKX (29.65). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. ICHKX (-31.53).
| ICHKX | MCDFX | ICHKX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.810 | 34.849 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.8M | 99.3M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 2.84 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.65 | 35.91 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.81 | 36.33 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.53 | -2.29 | 1,374% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.01 | 43.39 | -42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement