Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs MCDFX
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs MCDFX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$16.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.89M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. ICHKX (26.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: MCDFX (2.83) vs ICHKX (0.86). ICHKX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ICHKX (32 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. ICHKX (8.63). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: MCDFX (2500) vs ICHKX (5000). MCDFX (26.20) and ICHKX (25.85) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.82 vs. ICHKX (-31.94).
| ICHKX | MCDFX | ICHKX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.022 | 27.587 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9M | 97.7M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 2.83 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.85 | 26.20 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.30 | 18.26 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.94 | -8.82 | 362% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.85 | 39.01 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement