Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICHKX vs MCDFX
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ICHKX vs MCDFX
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$16.97
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.78M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.27
Change+$0.06 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.9M
ICHKX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICHKX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHKX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 92.9M vs. ICHKX (27.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: MCDFX (4.05) vs ICHKX (1.06). ICHKX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ICHKX (32 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. ICHKX (8.63). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: MCDFX (2500) vs ICHKX (5000). MCDFX (39.86) and ICHKX (39.65) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.61 vs. ICHKX (-36.64).
| ICHKX | MCDFX | ICHKX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.367 | 4.232 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.8M | 92.9M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 4.05 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.65 | 39.86 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.97 | 10.72 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.64 | -9.61 | 381% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.46 | 66.52 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement