ICHGF
Price
$116.96
Change
+$2.03 (+1.77%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
12.42B
MNOIY
Price
$21.95
Change
+$1.45 (+7.07%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICHGF vs MNOIY

Header iconICHGF vs MNOIY Comparison
Open Charts ICHGF vs MNOIYBanner chart's image
InterContinental Hotels Group
Price$116.96
Change+$2.03 (+1.77%)
Volume$349
Capitalization12.42B
Mandarin Oriental International
Price$21.95
Change+$1.45 (+7.07%)
Volume$712
Capitalization2.09B
ICHGF vs MNOIY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ICHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNOIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICHGF vs. MNOIY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHGF is a Buy and MNOIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ICHGF: $116.96 vs. MNOIY: $21.95)
Brand notoriety: ICHGF and MNOIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICHGF: 69% vs. MNOIY: 151%
Market capitalization -- ICHGF: $12.42B vs. MNOIY: $2.09B
ICHGF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $12.42B. MNOIY’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $2.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $72.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICHGF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMNOIY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ICHGF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MNOIY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICHGF is a better buy in the long-term than MNOIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICHGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNOIY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICHGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNOIY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICHGF is a better buy in the short-term than MNOIY.

Price Growth

ICHGF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNOIY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+4.24% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICHGF($12.4B) has a higher market cap than MNOIY($2.09B). MNOIY YTD gains are higher at: 44.885 vs. ICHGF (-5.435). ICHGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 815M vs. MNOIY (-22.7M). MNOIY has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. ICHGF (160M). MNOIY has less debt than ICHGF: MNOIY (699M) vs ICHGF (3.04B). ICHGF has higher revenues than MNOIY: ICHGF (3.89B) vs MNOIY (516M).
ICHGFMNOIYICHGF / MNOIY
Capitalization12.4B2.09B595%
EBITDA815M-22.7M-3,590%
Gain YTD-5.43544.885-12%
P/E Ratio35.09N/A-
Revenue3.89B516M754%
Total Cash160M349M46%
Total Debt3.04B699M435%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICHGF vs MNOIY: Fundamental Ratings
ICHGF
MNOIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1834
SMR RATING
1..100
1291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
192
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICHGF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNOIY (95). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.

ICHGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as MNOIY (34). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew similarly to MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.

ICHGF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNOIY (91). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.

MNOIY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ICHGF (52). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew similarly to ICHGF’s over the last 12 months.

MNOIY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as ICHGF (19). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew similarly to ICHGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICHGFMNOIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNOIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSLAX60.610.19
+0.31%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1
FSPCX93.100.26
+0.28%
Fidelity Select Insurance Port
IAUTX27.030.07
+0.26%
Invesco Dividend Income A
PMVYX20.600.05
+0.24%
Putnam Sustainable Future Y
DSHFX12.140.03
+0.21%
Brinker Capital Destinations Shelter I

ICHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICHGF and IHG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICHGF and IHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICHGF
1D Price
Change %
ICHGF100%
N/A
IHG - ICHGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
DLTTF - ICHGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACCYY - ICHGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
MAORF - ICHGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
MNOIY - ICHGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNOIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNOIY and ACCYY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNOIY and ACCYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNOIY
1D Price
Change %
MNOIY100%
N/A
ACCYY - MNOIY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
MAORF - MNOIY
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
HKSHF - MNOIY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACRFF - MNOIY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICHGF - MNOIY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More