ICHGF vs MNOIY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICHGF is a Hold and MNOIY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ICHGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMNOIY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ICHGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MNOIY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
ICHGF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +4.32% price change this week, while MNOIY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.61%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.48% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| ICHGF | MNOIY | ICHGF / MNOIY | |
| Capitalization | 12.4B | 2.09B | 595% |
| EBITDA | 815M | -22.7M | -3,590% |
| Gain YTD | 1.820 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 35.09 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.89B | 516M | 754% |
| Total Cash | 160M | 349M | 46% |
| Total Debt | 3.04B | 699M | 435% |
ICHGF | MNOIY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ICHGF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNOIY (95). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.
ICHGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNOIY (100). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.
ICHGF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNOIY (92). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.
ICHGF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNOIY (79). This means that ICHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.
MNOIY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ICHGF (19). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew similarly to ICHGF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
ICHGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ICHGF and IHG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICHGF and IHG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICHGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICHGF | 100% | +4.32% | ||
| IHG - ICHGF | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.38% | ||
| DLTTF - ICHGF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACCYY - ICHGF | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.13% | ||
| MAORF - ICHGF | 6% Poorly correlated | +8.57% | ||
| HFUS - ICHGF | 3% Poorly correlated | -14.47% | ||
More | ||||
MNOIY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNOIY and ACCYY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNOIY and ACCYY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNOIY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNOIY | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACCYY - MNOIY | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.13% | ||
| MAORF - MNOIY | 4% Poorly correlated | +8.57% | ||
| HKSHF - MNOIY | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACRFF - MNOIY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ICHGF - MNOIY | 1% Poorly correlated | +4.32% | ||
More | ||||