ICGUF
Price
$27.50
Change
+$1.95 (+7.63%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
5.25B
JHG
Price
$43.13
Change
+$0.08 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.22B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICGUF vs JHG

Header iconICGUF vs JHG Comparison
Open Charts ICGUF vs JHGBanner chart's image
Intermediate Capital Group
Price$27.50
Change+$1.95 (+7.63%)
Volume$250
Capitalization5.25B
Janus Henderson Group
Price$43.13
Change+$0.08 (+0.19%)
Volume$569.51K
Capitalization5.22B
ICGUF vs JHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ICGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICGUF vs. JHG commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICGUF is a Hold and JHG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ICGUF: $27.50 vs. JHG: $43.13)
Brand notoriety: ICGUF and JHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICGUF: 152% vs. JHG: 50%
Market capitalization -- ICGUF: $5.25B vs. JHG: $5.22B
ICGUF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.25B. JHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJHG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ICGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JHG is a better buy in the long-term than ICGUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICGUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JHG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICGUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • JHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICGUF is a better buy in the short-term than JHG.

Price Growth

ICGUF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JHG (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

JHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICGUF($5.25B) and JHG($5.22B) have the same market capitalization . ICGUF has higher P/E ratio than JHG: ICGUF (17.51) vs JHG (13.66). JHG YTD gains are higher at: 3.439 vs. ICGUF (1.340). JHG has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. ICGUF (183M). JHG has less debt than ICGUF: JHG (382M) vs ICGUF (6.11B). JHG has higher revenues than ICGUF: JHG (2.1B) vs ICGUF (447M).
ICGUFJHGICGUF / JHG
Capitalization5.25B5.22B101%
EBITDAN/A563M-
Gain YTD1.3403.43939%
P/E Ratio17.5113.66128%
Revenue447M2.1B21%
Total Cash183M1.89B10%
Total Debt6.11B382M1,599%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICGUF vs JHG: Fundamental Ratings
ICGUF
JHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5137
SMR RATING
1..100
6574
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6927
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICGUF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as JHG (33) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that ICGUF’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ICGUF (51) in the null industry. This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to ICGUF’s over the last 12 months.

ICGUF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as JHG (74) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that ICGUF’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ICGUF (54) in the null industry. This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to ICGUF’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICGUF (69) in the null industry. This means that JHG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICGUFJHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DUG35.630.29
+0.82%
ProShares UltraShort Energy
FTRI14.720.03
+0.22%
First Trust Indxx Glbl Natrl Res Inc ETF
SDTY45.64-0.02
-0.04%
YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Cov Cll Stgy ETF
EBND21.25-0.06
-0.28%
SPDR® Blmbg Em Mkts Lcl Bd ETF
GMF130.70-0.38
-0.29%
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF

ICGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICGUF and NINTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICGUF and NINTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICGUF
1D Price
Change %
ICGUF100%
N/A
NINTF - ICGUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WT - ICGUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
DTSRF - ICGUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
JHG - ICGUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
BCSF - ICGUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHG
1D Price
Change %
JHG100%
+0.19%
KKR - JHG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
CG - JHG
83%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
STEP - JHG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
BN - JHG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
BX - JHG
80%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
More