Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICGTX vs RBBAX
ICGTX vs RBBAX Comparison
Open Charts ICGTX vs RBBAX
Voya Solution Conservative Port S2
Price$10.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.72M
Columbia Income Builder A
Price$12.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets856M
ICGTX vs RBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICGTX vs. RBBAX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICGTX is a Buy and RBBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBBAX has more cash in the bank: 856M vs. ICGTX (93.7M). RBBAX pays higher dividends than ICGTX: RBBAX (3.85) vs ICGTX (2.41). ICGTX was incepted earlier than RBBAX: ICGTX (16 years) vs RBBAX (20 years). ICGTX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RBBAX (0.97). ICGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RBBAX (18.00). ICGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBAX: ICGTX (0) vs RBBAX (2000). RBBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. ICGTX (8.29). RBBAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.43 vs. ICGTX (1.58).
| ICGTX | RBBAX | ICGTX / RBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.97 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.97 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.662 | 1.297 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 93.7M | 856M | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 3.85 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 11.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.20 | 24.32 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.58 | 13.43 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.54 | 62.66 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement