| ICF | PGZ | ICF / PGZ | |
| Gain YTD | 1.592 | 1.944 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 75.9M | 2,560% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 2.62 | 12% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 25.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 2.80 | 6.47 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| ICF | PGZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICF has been closely correlated with EQR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICF jumps, then EQR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGZ and DLR have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGZ and DLR's prices will move in lockstep.