Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICEQX vs RWMFX
ICEQX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts ICEQX vs RWMFX
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class R6
Price$24.91
Change+$0.23 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.86B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.30
Change+$0.53 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
ICEQX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICEQX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICEQX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. ICEQX (3.86B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ICEQX: RWMFX (1.42) vs ICEQX (0.29). ICEQX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ICEQX (11 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). ICEQX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ICEQX (24.00). ICEQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: ICEQX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.82 vs. ICEQX (3.95). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.69 vs. ICEQX (39.99).
| ICEQX | RWMFX | ICEQX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.31 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.753 | 10.631 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.86B | 207B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.42 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.95 | 4.82 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.71 | 41.37 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.99 | 53.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.99 | 76.74 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement