Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICEQX vs RWMFX
ICEQX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts ICEQX vs RWMFX
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class R6
Price$23.97
Change-$0.17 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.43
Change-$0.15 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.49B
ICEQX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICEQX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICEQX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. ICEQX (4B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ICEQX: RWMFX (1.46) vs ICEQX (0.31). ICEQX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ICEQX (11 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). ICEQX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ICEQX (24.00). ICEQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: ICEQX (0) vs RWMFX (250). ICEQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. RWMFX (6.61). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.87 vs. ICEQX (38.43).
| ICEQX | RWMFX | ICEQX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.385 | 7.164 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 203B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.46 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | 6.61 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.79 | 24.20 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.43 | 49.87 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.69 | 70.91 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement