Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICEQX vs RWEBX
ICEQX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts ICEQX vs RWEBX
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class R6
Price$24.91
Change+$0.23 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.86B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.85
Change+$0.53 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
ICEQX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICEQX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICEQX is a Buy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. ICEQX (3.86B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than ICEQX: RWEBX (0.76) vs ICEQX (0.29). ICEQX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: ICEQX (11 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than ICEQX (0.69). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ICEQX (24.00). ICEQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: ICEQX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX (4.00) and ICEQX (3.95) have marching annual gain over last year. RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.23 vs. ICEQX (39.99).
| ICEQX | RWEBX | ICEQX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.06 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.753 | 9.951 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.86B | 207B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.76 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.95 | 4.00 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.71 | 38.34 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.99 | 49.23 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.99 | 70.72 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement