ICE
Price
$181.20
Change
-$1.48 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
103.72B
74 days until earnings call
TW
Price
$130.20
Change
-$0.35 (-0.27%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
27.78B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICE vs TW

Header iconICE vs TW Comparison
Open Charts ICE vs TWBanner chart's image
Intercontinental Exchange
Price$181.20
Change-$1.48 (-0.81%)
Volume$2.84M
Capitalization103.72B
Tradeweb Markets
Price$130.20
Change-$0.35 (-0.27%)
Volume$1M
Capitalization27.78B
ICE vs TW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICE vs. TW commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a Hold and TW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ICE: $181.20 vs. TW: $130.20)
Brand notoriety: ICE and TW are both not notable
ICE represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while TW is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICE: 120% vs. TW: 85%
Market capitalization -- ICE: $103.72B vs. TW: $27.78B
ICE [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $103.72B. TW’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $27.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $169.89B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.55B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ICE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICE is a better buy in the long-term than TW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICE is a better buy in the short-term than TW.

Price Growth

ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.79% price change this week, while TW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

TW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.30% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($104B) has a higher market cap than TW($27.8B). TW has higher P/E ratio than ICE: TW (50.27) vs ICE (34.78). ICE YTD gains are higher at: 22.272 vs. TW (-0.379). ICE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.4B vs. TW (1.08B). ICE has more cash in the bank: 2.64B vs. TW (1.63B). TW has less debt than ICE: TW (32.3M) vs ICE (19.7B). ICE has higher revenues than TW: ICE (12.6B) vs TW (1.94B).
ICETWICE / TW
Capitalization104B27.8B374%
EBITDA6.4B1.08B592%
Gain YTD22.272-0.379-5,877%
P/E Ratio34.7850.2769%
Revenue12.6B1.94B651%
Total Cash2.64B1.63B162%
Total Debt19.7B32.3M60,991%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICE vs TW: Fundamental Ratings
ICE
TW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7169
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2029
SMR RATING
1..100
6672
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6567
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6525

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICE's Valuation (73) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TW (98) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to TW’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TW (29) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to TW’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's SMR Rating (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TW (72) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to TW’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TW (59) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to TW’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TW (67) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to TW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICETW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POLYX.X0.1400010.003354
+2.45%
Polymesh cryptocurrency
AERGO.X0.1144270.002052
+1.83%
Aergo cryptocurrency
FIO.X0.0181320.000221
+1.23%
FIO Protocol cryptocurrency
WIF.X0.8850660.010603
+1.21%
dogwifhat cryptocurrency
NPXS.X0.000090N/A
+0.16%
Pundi X (Old) cryptocurrency

ICE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICE
1D Price
Change %
ICE100%
-0.81%
NDAQ - ICE
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MCO - ICE
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
SPGI - ICE
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
MORN - ICE
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
TW - ICE
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
More

TW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TW has been loosely correlated with ICE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TW jumps, then ICE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TW
1D Price
Change %
TW100%
-0.27%
ICE - TW
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
NDAQ - TW
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
CME - TW
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
VIRT - TW
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
MORN - TW
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More