ICE
Price
$167.73
Change
+$0.45 (+0.27%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
96.01B
32 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$87.51
Change
+$0.78 (+0.90%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
50.21B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICE vs NDAQ

Header iconICE vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts ICE vs NDAQBanner chart's image
Intercontinental Exchange
Price$167.73
Change+$0.45 (+0.27%)
Volume$2.56M
Capitalization96.01B
Nasdaq
Price$87.51
Change+$0.78 (+0.90%)
Volume$2.43M
Capitalization50.21B
ICE vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICE vs. NDAQ commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a StrongBuy and NDAQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ICE: $167.73 vs. NDAQ: $87.51)
Brand notoriety: ICE and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICE: 87% vs. NDAQ: 67%
Market capitalization -- ICE: $96.01B vs. NDAQ: $50.21B
ICE [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $96.01B. NDAQ’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $50.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ICE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICE is a better buy in the long-term than NDAQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICE is a better buy in the short-term than NDAQ.

Price Growth

ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -1.20% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -2.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.63% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($96B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($50.2B). NDAQ (33.66) and ICE (32.19) have similar P/E ratio . NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 14.247 vs. ICE (13.499). NDAQ has less debt than ICE: NDAQ (9.63B) vs ICE (19.7B).
ICENDAQICE / NDAQ
Capitalization96B50.2B191%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.49914.24795%
P/E Ratio32.1933.6696%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt19.7B9.63B205%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICE vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
ICE
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5165
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3121
SMR RATING
1..100
6858
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7074
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICE's Valuation (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (57). This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (31). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's SMR Rating (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (68). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (61). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (74). This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICENDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
R187.743.15
+1.71%
Ryder System
ZUMZ19.970.33
+1.68%
Zumiez
PZZA47.000.25
+0.53%
Papa John's International
MBINM24.900.04
+0.14%
Merchants Bancorp
SER4.97-0.01
-0.20%
Serina Therapeutics

ICE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICE
1D Price
Change %
ICE100%
+0.27%
NDAQ - ICE
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
MCO - ICE
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
SPGI - ICE
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
MORN - ICE
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
TW - ICE
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+0.90%
MCO - NDAQ
77%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
MS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
JEF - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
SPGI - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
GS - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
More