ICE
Price
$184.44
Change
+$0.86 (+0.47%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
78.69B
5 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$94.84
Change
+$1.34 (+1.43%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
36.33B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICE vs NDAQ

Header iconICE vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts ICE vs NDAQBanner chart's image
Intercontinental Exchange
Price$184.44
Change+$0.86 (+0.47%)
Volume$2.59M
Capitalization78.69B
Nasdaq
Price$94.84
Change+$1.34 (+1.43%)
Volume$5.28M
Capitalization36.33B
ICE vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICE vs. NDAQ commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a StrongBuy and NDAQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ICE: $184.44 vs. NDAQ: $94.84)
Brand notoriety: ICE and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICE: 115% vs. NDAQ: 155%
Market capitalization -- ICE: $78.69B vs. NDAQ: $36.33B
ICE [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $78.69B. NDAQ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $36.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ICE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICE is a better buy in the long-term than NDAQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ICE and NDAQ are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ICE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.06% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +6.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICE is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($78.7B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($36.3B). ICE has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: ICE (32.70) vs NDAQ (29.93). ICE (24.459) and NDAQ (23.468) have similar YTD gains . ICE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.92B vs. NDAQ (2B). ICE has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. NDAQ (641M). NDAQ has less debt than ICE: NDAQ (10.9B) vs ICE (22.9B). ICE has higher revenues than NDAQ: ICE (9.9B) vs NDAQ (6.06B).
ICENDAQICE / NDAQ
Capitalization78.7B36.3B217%
EBITDA4.92B2B246%
Gain YTD24.45923.468104%
P/E Ratio32.7029.93109%
Revenue9.9B6.06B163%
Total Cash1.13B641M176%
Total Debt22.9B10.9B210%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICE vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
ICE
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1576
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1712
SMR RATING
1..100
6764
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2612
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NDAQ's Valuation (88) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (94). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (17). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's SMR Rating (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (67). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (26). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (62). This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICENDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNGZ34.250.06
+0.19%
FirstTrust S&P500 DvrsDiv AristocratsETF
EVM8.620.01
+0.17%
Eaton Vance California Municipal
SCHD27.320.04
+0.15%
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
KXI65.41N/A
N/A
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
ZSB14.25N/A
N/A
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Stgy Fd

ICE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICE
1D Price
Change %
ICE100%
+0.47%
NDAQ - ICE
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
MCO - ICE
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
SPGI - ICE
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
MORN - ICE
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
TW - ICE
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+1.43%
MCO - NDAQ
74%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
JEF - NDAQ
72%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
MORN - NDAQ
72%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
SF - NDAQ
68%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
MS - NDAQ
68%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
More