ICE
Price
$153.60
Change
+$0.24 (+0.16%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
87.92B
11 days until earnings call
MORN
Price
$214.51
Change
+$3.80 (+1.80%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.05B
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICE vs MORN

Header iconICE vs MORN Comparison
Open Charts ICE vs MORNBanner chart's image
Intercontinental Exchange
Price$153.60
Change+$0.24 (+0.16%)
Volume$4.09M
Capitalization87.92B
Morningstar
Price$214.51
Change+$3.80 (+1.80%)
Volume$284.05K
Capitalization9.05B
ICE vs MORN Comparison Chart in %
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MORN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICE vs. MORN commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a Hold and MORN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ICE: $153.60 vs. MORN: $214.51)
Brand notoriety: ICE and MORN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICE: 127% vs. MORN: 73%
Market capitalization -- ICE: $87.92B vs. MORN: $9.05B
ICE [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $87.92B. MORN’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $9.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $144.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMORN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ICE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MORN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MORN is a better buy in the long-term than ICE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MORN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MORN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICE is a better buy in the short-term than MORN.

Price Growth

ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.48% price change this week, while MORN (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -4.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MORN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.05% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($87.9B) has a higher market cap than MORN($9.05B). ICE has higher P/E ratio than MORN: ICE (29.48) vs MORN (22.82). ICE YTD gains are higher at: 3.938 vs. MORN (-35.888). ICE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.4B vs. MORN (772M). MORN has less debt than ICE: MORN (1.03B) vs ICE (19.7B). ICE has higher revenues than MORN: ICE (12.6B) vs MORN (2.35B).
ICEMORNICE / MORN
Capitalization87.9B9.05B971%
EBITDA6.4B772M830%
Gain YTD3.938-35.888-11%
P/E Ratio29.4822.82129%
Revenue12.6B2.35B537%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt19.7B1.03B1,905%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICE vs MORN: Fundamental Ratings
ICE
MORN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6276
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3472
SMR RATING
1..100
6836
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6388
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7393
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MORN's Valuation (50) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (62) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MORN (72) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew somewhat faster than MORN’s over the last 12 months.

MORN's SMR Rating (36) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MORN (88) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MORN (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICEMORN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MORN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XCOR78.340.28
+0.36%
FundX ETF
SJCP25.27N/A
N/A
SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF
SCHE33.52-0.08
-0.24%
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF™
LGOV22.17-0.05
-0.24%
First Trust Long Duration Opp ETF
AMOM48.90-0.29
-0.60%
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF

ICE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICE
1D Price
Change %
ICE100%
+0.16%
NDAQ - ICE
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
MCO - ICE
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
SPGI - ICE
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
MORN - ICE
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
TW - ICE
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More

MORN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MORN has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MORN jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MORN
1D Price
Change %
MORN100%
+1.80%
MCO - MORN
74%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
SPGI - MORN
70%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
NDAQ - MORN
69%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
MSCI - MORN
66%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
JEF - MORN
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.94%
More