ICE
Price
$181.20
Change
-$1.48 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
103.72B
74 days until earnings call
MCO
Price
$516.46
Change
-$4.86 (-0.93%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
92.63B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICE vs MCO

Header iconICE vs MCO Comparison
Open Charts ICE vs MCOBanner chart's image
Intercontinental Exchange
Price$181.20
Change-$1.48 (-0.81%)
Volume$2.84M
Capitalization103.72B
Moody's
Price$516.46
Change-$4.86 (-0.93%)
Volume$410.19K
Capitalization92.63B
ICE vs MCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICE vs. MCO commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a Hold and MCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ICE: $181.20 vs. MCO: $516.46)
Brand notoriety: ICE and MCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICE: 120% vs. MCO: 57%
Market capitalization -- ICE: $103.72B vs. MCO: $92.63B
ICE [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $103.72B. MCO’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $92.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $169.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ICE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the long-term than ICE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the short-term than ICE.

Price Growth

ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.79% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.30% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($104B) has a higher market cap than MCO($92.6B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than ICE: MCO (43.92) vs ICE (34.78). ICE YTD gains are higher at: 22.272 vs. MCO (9.717). MCO has less debt than ICE: MCO (7.28B) vs ICE (19.7B).
ICEMCOICE / MCO
Capitalization104B92.6B112%
EBITDA6.4BN/A-
Gain YTD22.2729.717229%
P/E Ratio34.7843.9279%
Revenue12.6BN/A-
Total Cash2.64BN/A-
Total Debt19.7B7.28B271%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICE vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
ICE
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2031
SMR RATING
1..100
6618
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6558
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICE's Valuation (73) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (88) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's SMR Rating (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICE (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICE’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (34) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (65) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICEMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AR.X7.3125170.095598
+1.32%
Arweave cryptocurrency
PSR90.660.52
+0.57%
Invesco Active US Real Estate
EVM8.940.03
+0.30%
Eaton Vance California Municipal
FAUG50.720.03
+0.06%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Aug
AIRL33.10N/A
N/A
Themes Airlines ETF

ICE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICE
1D Price
Change %
ICE100%
-0.81%
NDAQ - ICE
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MCO - ICE
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
SPGI - ICE
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
MORN - ICE
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
TW - ICE
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
More

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
-0.75%
SPGI - MCO
84%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
NDAQ - MCO
77%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
MORN - MCO
74%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
TRU - MCO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
JEF - MCO
67%
Closely correlated
-2.37%
More