ICE
Price
$150.31
Change
+$2.02 (+1.36%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
46 days until earnings call
MCO
Price
$466.35
Change
+$4.26 (+0.92%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
53 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ICE vs MCO

Header iconICE vs MCO Comparison
Open Charts ICE vs MCOBanner chart's image
Intercontinental Exchange
Price$150.31
Change+$2.02 (+1.36%)
Volume$6.45M
CapitalizationN/A
Moody's
Price$466.35
Change+$4.26 (+0.92%)
Volume$1.59M
CapitalizationN/A
ICE vs MCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICE vs. MCO commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a Hold and MCO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (ICE: $150.31 vs. MCO: $466.35)
Brand notoriety: ICE and MCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICE: 197% vs. MCO: 235%
Market capitalization -- ICE: $78.69B vs. MCO: $71.91B
ICE [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $78.69B. MCO’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $71.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ICE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICE is a better buy in the long-term than MCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the short-term than ICE.

Price Growth

ICE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.11% price change this week, while MCO (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICE is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

MCO is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.65% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($78.7B) has a higher market cap than MCO($71.9B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than ICE: MCO (45.12) vs ICE (32.70). MCO YTD gains are higher at: 20.358 vs. ICE (18.483). ICE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.92B vs. MCO (2.49B). MCO has less debt than ICE: MCO (7.27B) vs ICE (22.9B). ICE has higher revenues than MCO: ICE (9.9B) vs MCO (5.73B).
ICEMCOICE / MCO
Capitalization78.7B71.9B109%
EBITDA4.92B2.49B198%
Gain YTD18.48320.35891%
P/E Ratio32.7045.1272%
Revenue9.9B5.73B173%
Total Cash1.13BN/A-
Total Debt22.9B7.27B315%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICE vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
ICE
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6890
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2219
SMR RATING
1..100
7383
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4371
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICE's Valuation (92) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's SMR Rating (73) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (83) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (51) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (71) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICEMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X97224.730000-531.203100
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

ICE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICE
1D Price
Change %
ICE100%
+1.36%
NDAQ - ICE
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
MCO - ICE
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
SPGI - ICE
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
MORN - ICE
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
LNSTY - ICE
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
More

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
+0.92%
SPGI - MCO
75%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
MORN - MCO
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
NDAQ - MCO
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
ICE - MCO
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
FDS - MCO
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
More