Advertisement
ICE vs INFL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a Hold and INFL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ICE’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- ICE’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ICE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ICE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ICE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.13% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
ICE is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.41% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
ICE | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ICE | INFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 36% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 45% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
ICE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICE | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| SPGI - ICE | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| NDAQ - ICE | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| MCO - ICE | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| MORN - ICE | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| TW - ICE | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||
INFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFL has been loosely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INFL jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFL | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| WPM - INFL | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| FNV - INFL | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| TPL - INFL | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| ICE - INFL | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| BG - INFL | 41% Loosely correlated | +5.69% | ||
More | ||||