Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICBMX vs TRNEX
ICBMX vs TRNEX Comparison
Open Charts ICBMX vs TRNEX
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$16.59
Change-$0.29 (-1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.19M
T. Rowe Price New Era I
Price$39.67
Change+$0.17 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.39B
ICBMX vs TRNEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICBMX vs. TRNEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICBMX is a Buy and TRNEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRNEX has more cash in the bank: 2.39B vs. ICBMX (113M). TRNEX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: TRNEX (2.27) vs ICBMX (0.79). ICBMX was incepted earlier than TRNEX: ICBMX (28 years) vs TRNEX (10 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than TRNEX (0.57). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. TRNEX (24.30). ICBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRNEX: ICBMX (1000) vs TRNEX (500000). TRNEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.77 vs. ICBMX (-7.76). ICBMX (67.72) and TRNEX (66.64) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ICBMX | TRNEX | ICBMX / TRNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.57 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.57 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.434 | 6.898 | -50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 2.39B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 2.27 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.76 | 2.77 | -280% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.30 | 7.35 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.72 | 66.64 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement