Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICBMX vs TRNEX
ICBMX vs TRNEX Comparison
Open Charts ICBMX vs TRNEX
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$20.24
Change+$0.65 (+3.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.03M
T. Rowe Price New Era I
Price$42.65
Change+$0.42 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.43B
ICBMX vs TRNEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICBMX vs. TRNEX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICBMX is a Buy and TRNEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRNEX has more cash in the bank: 2.43B vs. ICBMX (124M). TRNEX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: TRNEX (2.01) vs ICBMX (0.66). ICBMX was incepted earlier than TRNEX: ICBMX (28 years) vs TRNEX (10 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than TRNEX (0.57). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. TRNEX (24.30). ICBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRNEX: ICBMX (1000) vs TRNEX (500000). ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. TRNEX (3.67). TRNEX (63.85) and ICBMX (62.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ICBMX | TRNEX | ICBMX / TRNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.57 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.57 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.028 | 13.797 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 124M | 2.43B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.10 | 3.67 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.77 | 17.18 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.17 | 63.85 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement