Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICBAX vs TRNEX
ICBAX vs TRNEX Comparison
Open Charts ICBAX vs TRNEX
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$16.28
Change-$0.29 (-1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.19M
T. Rowe Price New Era I
Price$39.67
Change+$0.17 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.39B
ICBAX vs TRNEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICBAX vs. TRNEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICBAX is a Buy and TRNEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRNEX has more cash in the bank: 2.39B vs. ICBAX (113M). TRNEX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: TRNEX (2.27) vs ICBAX (0.58). ICBAX was incepted earlier than TRNEX: ICBAX (15 years) vs TRNEX (10 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than TRNEX (0.57). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. TRNEX (24.30). ICBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRNEX: ICBAX (1000) vs TRNEX (500000). TRNEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.77 vs. ICBAX (-8.16). TRNEX (66.64) and ICBAX (64.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ICBAX | TRNEX | ICBAX / TRNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.57 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.57 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.497 | 6.898 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 2.39B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 2.27 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.16 | 2.77 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.40 | 7.35 | -46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.97 | 66.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement