Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ICBAX vs TRNEX
ICBAX vs TRNEX Comparison
Open Charts ICBAX vs TRNEX
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$17.76
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.78M
T. Rowe Price New Era I
Price$40.44
Change-$0.07 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.4B
ICBAX vs TRNEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ICBAX vs. TRNEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICBAX is a Buy and TRNEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRNEX has more cash in the bank: 2.4B vs. ICBAX (121M). TRNEX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: TRNEX (2.18) vs ICBAX (0.55). ICBAX was incepted earlier than TRNEX: ICBAX (15 years) vs TRNEX (10 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than TRNEX (0.57). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. TRNEX (24.30). ICBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRNEX: ICBAX (1000) vs TRNEX (500000). TRNEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.14 vs. ICBAX (-2.38). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 65.56 vs. TRNEX (60.04).
| ICBAX | TRNEX | ICBAX / TRNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.57 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.57 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.276 | 8.973 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 2.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 2.18 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | 3.14 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.37 | 17.48 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.56 | 60.04 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement