Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBOT vs SMH
IBOT vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts IBOT vs SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$278.42
Change+$3.22 (+1.17%)
Volume$8.17M
Net Assets25.99B
IBOT vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBOT vs. SMH commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBOT is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 26B vs. IBOT (17.2M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than IBOT: SMH (14.969) vs IBOT (11.608). IBOT was incepted earlier than SMH: IBOT (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IBOT (0.47). SMH has a higher turnover IBOT (13.00) vs IBOT (13.00).
| IBOT | SMH | IBOT / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 11.608 | 14.969 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 17.2M | 26B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 18.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 2.73 | 0.45 | 610% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IBOT | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBOT has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBOT jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBOT | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| ASML - IBOT | 77% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| TER - IBOT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| KLAC - IBOT | 73% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| LRCX - IBOT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| AMAT - IBOT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||