IBO vs IPA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBO is a Buy and IPA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IBO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIPA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IBO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- IPA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- IPA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
IBO (@Biotechnology) experienced а -30.66% price change this week, while IPA (@Biotechnology) price change was +13.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -7.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.61%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (-7.12% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| IBO | IPA | IBO / IPA | |
| Capitalization | 16.9M | 13.7M | 123% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -99.622 | -74.678 | 133% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.52 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
IBO | IPA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IPA's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBO (48). This means that IPA’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBO’s over the last 12 months.
IPA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IBO (100). This means that IPA’s stock grew similarly to IBO’s over the last 12 months.
IBO's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as IPA (97). This means that IBO’s stock grew similarly to IPA’s over the last 12 months.
IPA's Price Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as IBO (94). This means that IPA’s stock grew similarly to IBO’s over the last 12 months.
IBO's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as IPA (100). This means that IBO’s stock grew similarly to IPA’s over the last 12 months.
| IPA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
IBO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBO has been loosely correlated with BMRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBO jumps, then BMRN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBO | 100% | -34.96% | ||
| BMRN - IBO | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.72% | ||
| ITOS - IBO | 44% Loosely correlated | -5.59% | ||
| NCNA - IBO | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| APVO - IBO | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.14% | ||
| ADAG - IBO | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
More | ||||
IPA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPA and BTAX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPA and BTAX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPA | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| BTAX - IPA | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.01% | ||
| KURA - IPA | 23% Poorly correlated | -6.37% | ||
| AFMD - IPA | 22% Poorly correlated | -16.56% | ||
| TPST - IPA | 22% Poorly correlated | -11.57% | ||
| IBO - IPA | 22% Poorly correlated | -34.96% | ||
More | ||||