Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNCX vs RLEFX
IBNCX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts IBNCX vs RLEFX
Nomura Balanced Fund
Price$25.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$37.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
IBNCX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNCX vs. RLEFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNCX is a Buy and RLEFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. IBNCX (2B). RLEFX pays higher dividends than IBNCX: RLEFX (1.86) vs IBNCX (0.41). IBNCX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: IBNCX (22 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). IBNCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). IBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNCX: RLEFX (250) vs IBNCX (1000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. IBNCX (8.57). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. IBNCX (1.05).
| IBNCX | RLEFX | IBNCX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.39 | 444% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.39 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.120 | 10.872 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.57 | 9.28 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.88 | 38.81 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.05 | 35.80 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.86 | 75.29 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement