Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNCX vs RLBGX
IBNCX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts IBNCX vs RLBGX
Nomura Balanced Fund
Price$25.27
Change-$0.19 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$38.44
Change-$0.55 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
IBNCX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNCX vs. RLBGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNCX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. IBNCX (1.97B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than IBNCX: RLBGX (2.18) vs IBNCX (0.47). IBNCX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: IBNCX (22 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). IBNCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). IBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNCX: RLBGX (250) vs IBNCX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.74 vs. IBNCX (7.53). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. IBNCX (-1.35).
| IBNCX | RLBGX | IBNCX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.25 | 692% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.25 | 736% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.798 | 2.479 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 2.18 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 11.74 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.53 | 38.20 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.35 | 37.59 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.24 | 92.40 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement