Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNCX vs RLBFX
IBNCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBNCX vs RLBFX
Macquarie Balanced Fund
Price$25.38
Change-$0.32 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
IBNCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. IBNCX (2.04B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBNCX: RLBFX (1.97) vs IBNCX (0.41). IBNCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBNCX (22 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). IBNCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). IBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNCX: RLBFX (250) vs IBNCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. IBNCX (8.07). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. IBNCX (0.22).
| IBNCX | RLBFX | IBNCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.29 | 597% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.29 | 634% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.555 | 16.507 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.97 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 10.28 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.38 | 44.74 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.22 | 43.06 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.27 | 81.39 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement