Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNAX vs RLBFX
IBNAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBNAX vs RLBFX
Nomura Balanced Fund
Price$25.99
Change-$0.08 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.58
Change+$0.15 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
IBNAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. IBNAX (2B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBNAX: RLBFX (2.19) vs IBNAX (1.20). IBNAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBNAX (38 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). IBNAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). IBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNAX: RLBFX (250) vs IBNAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. IBNAX (12.05). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.38 vs. IBNAX (4.11).
| IBNAX | RLBFX | IBNAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.29 | 338% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.29 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.484 | 2.344 | 63% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.19 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.05 | 14.57 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.72 | 39.01 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.11 | 38.38 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.12 | 92.91 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers