Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNAX vs RLBFX
IBNAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBNAX vs RLBFX
Nomura Balanced Fund
Price$25.52
Change-$0.72 (-2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.82
Change-$0.50 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
IBNAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNAX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. IBNAX (2.01B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBNAX: RLBFX (1.93) vs IBNAX (0.95). IBNAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBNAX (38 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). IBNAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). IBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNAX: RLBFX (250) vs IBNAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.93 vs. IBNAX (8.96). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.52 vs. IBNAX (8.10).
| IBNAX | RLBFX | IBNAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.29 | 338% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.29 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.518 | 18.535 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.93 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.96 | 10.93 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.26 | 45.02 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.10 | 42.52 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.04 | 84.17 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement