Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNAX vs RLBFX
IBNAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBNAX vs RLBFX
Macquarie Balanced Fund
Price$25.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
IBNAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. IBNAX (2.04B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBNAX: RLBFX (2.00) vs IBNAX (0.96). IBNAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBNAX (38 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IBNAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). IBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNAX: RLBFX (250) vs IBNAX (1000). IBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. RLBFX (9.05). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. IBNAX (6.95).
| IBNAX | RLBFX | IBNAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.29 | 338% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.29 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.103 | 14.890 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 265B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 2.00 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.61 | 9.05 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.67 | 51.85 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.95 | 43.90 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.22 | 78.80 | 18% |