Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNAX vs RLBEX
IBNAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts IBNAX vs RLBEX
Nomura Balanced Fund
Price$25.99
Change-$0.08 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.43
Change+$0.14 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
IBNAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNAX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. IBNAX (2B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than IBNAX: RLBEX (1.92) vs IBNAX (1.20). IBNAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: IBNAX (38 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). IBNAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). IBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNAX: RLBEX (250) vs IBNAX (1000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.23 vs. IBNAX (12.05). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.62 vs. IBNAX (4.11).
| IBNAX | RLBEX | IBNAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.59 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.59 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.484 | 2.352 | 63% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.92 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.05 | 14.23 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.72 | 37.77 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.11 | 36.62 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.12 | 91.52 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement