Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNAX vs RLBCX
IBNAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts IBNAX vs RLBCX
Nomura Balanced Fund
Price$25.52
Change-$0.72 (-2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.45
Change-$0.49 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
IBNAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNAX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. IBNAX (2.01B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than IBNAX: RLBCX (1.44) vs IBNAX (0.95). IBNAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: IBNAX (38 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). IBNAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). IBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNAX: RLBCX (250) vs IBNAX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. IBNAX (8.96). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.90 vs. IBNAX (8.10).
| IBNAX | RLBCX | IBNAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.89 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.89 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.518 | 17.876 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.44 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.96 | 10.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.26 | 42.57 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.10 | 38.90 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.04 | 77.32 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement