It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IBM’s FA Score shows that 5 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IBM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
IBM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -0.87% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.20%.
IBM is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
IBM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IBM | MDLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 7 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 7 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 7 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 7 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 45% | 15 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSOX | 3.78 | 0.05 | +1.34% |
| AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF | |||
| SMLV | 132.20 | 1.55 | +1.18% |
| State Street® SPDR® USSmCapLowVolIndETF | |||
| IWD | 210.33 | 1.90 | +0.91% |
| iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | |||
| EOI | 19.68 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund | |||
| ELC | 20.67 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| Entergy Louisiana LLC | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBM has been loosely correlated with ACN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBM jumps, then ACN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| ACN - IBM | 48% Loosely correlated | +4.53% | ||
| DXC - IBM | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| CTSH - IBM | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| CDW - IBM | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| INGM - IBM | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that MDLV and MDT have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDLV and MDT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLV | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| MDT - MDLV | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
| XOM - MDLV | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| LMT - MDLV | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| VZ - MDLV | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| IBM - MDLV | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
More | ||||