Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBLLX vs RLBFX
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$36.22
Change-$0.40 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. IBLLX (1.5B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBFX (1.97) vs IBLLX (0.72). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBFX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. IBLLX (3.10). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. IBLLX (19.34).
| IBLLX | RLBFX | IBLLX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.734 | 16.507 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.97 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 10.28 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.10 | 44.74 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.34 | 43.06 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.38 | 81.39 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement