Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBLLX vs RLBAX
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBAX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$35.23
Change-$0.07 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. IBLLX (1.46B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBAX (1.17) vs IBLLX (0.83). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBAX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. IBLLX (3.19). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. IBLLX (18.95).
| IBLLX | RLBAX | IBLLX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.288 | 9.243 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.17 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.19 | 7.15 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.01 | 27.06 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.95 | 33.77 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.19 | 59.12 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement