IBKR
Price
$74.93
Change
+$2.31 (+3.18%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
33.37B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NAKA
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.62 (-65.96%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
215.95M
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBKR vs NAKA

Header iconIBKR vs NAKA Comparison
Open Charts IBKR vs NAKABanner chart's image
Interactive Brokers Group
Price$74.93
Change+$2.31 (+3.18%)
Volume$5.48M
Capitalization33.37B
Nakamoto
Price$0.32
Change-$0.62 (-65.96%)
Volume$4.67M
Capitalization215.95M
IBKR vs NAKA Comparison Chart in %
IBKR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAKA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IBKR vs. NAKA commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBKR is a StrongBuy and NAKA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (IBKR: $74.93 vs. NAKA: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: IBKR and NAKA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBKR: 124% vs. NAKA: 50%
Market capitalization -- IBKR: $33.37B vs. NAKA: $215.95M
IBKR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $33.37B. NAKA’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $215.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBKR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNAKA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IBKR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NAKA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBKR is a better buy in the long-term than NAKA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IBKR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAKA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IBKR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NAKA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IBKR and NAKA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while NAKA (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -17.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

IBKR is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.

NAKA is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBKR($33.4B) has a higher market cap than NAKA($216M). IBKR YTD gains are higher at: 16.514 vs. NAKA (-8.602). IBKR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.78B vs. NAKA (-89.61M). IBKR has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. NAKA (24.2M). NAKA has less debt than IBKR: NAKA (204M) vs IBKR (904M). IBKR has higher revenues than NAKA: IBKR (9.9B) vs NAKA (1.98M).
IBKRNAKAIBKR / NAKA
Capitalization33.4B216M15,463%
EBITDA8.78B-89.61M-9,794%
Gain YTD16.514-8.602-192%
P/E Ratio33.75N/A-
Revenue9.9B1.98M500,202%
Total Cash5.13B24.2M21,190%
Total Debt904M204M443%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBKR: Fundamental Ratings
IBKR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IBKRNAKA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IBKR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAKA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VAW232.015.00
+2.20%
Vanguard Materials ETF
SPVM70.900.68
+0.97%
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
WDEF32.780.10
+0.30%
WisdomTree Europe Defense Fund
IBD24.04-0.05
-0.21%
Inspire Corporate Bond ETF
GLIV2.25-0.08
-3.43%
Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT)

IBKR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBKR
1D Price
Change %
IBKR100%
-0.45%
HOOD - IBKR
74%
Closely correlated
-3.16%
MS - IBKR
70%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
GS - IBKR
70%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
RJF - IBKR
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
EVR - IBKR
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.50%
More

NAKA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAKA has been loosely correlated with ABTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NAKA jumps, then ABTC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAKA
1D Price
Change %
NAKA100%
-10.11%
ABTC - NAKA
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.59%
FUTU - NAKA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
CCM - NAKA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBKR - NAKA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
SRTA - NAKA
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
More