IBIDF
Price
$57.39
Change
-$4.49 (-7.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.34B
KULR
Price
$4.25
Change
-$0.11 (-2.52%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
174.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBIDF vs KULR

Header iconIBIDF vs KULR Comparison
Open Charts IBIDF vs KULRBanner chart's image
Ibiden
Price$57.39
Change-$4.49 (-7.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.34B
KULR Technology Group
Price$4.25
Change-$0.11 (-2.52%)
Volume$1.11M
Capitalization174.71M
IBIDF vs KULR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IBIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KULR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IBIDF vs. KULR commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBIDF is a Hold and KULR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (IBIDF: $57.39 vs. KULR: $4.25)
Brand notoriety: IBIDF and KULR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBIDF: 90% vs. KULR: 65%
Market capitalization -- IBIDF: $8.34B vs. KULR: $174.71M
IBIDF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $8.34B. KULR’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $174.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $149.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBIDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKULR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IBIDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • KULR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBIDF is a better buy in the long-term than KULR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IBIDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KULR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IBIDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • KULR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KULR is a better buy in the short-term than IBIDF.

Price Growth

IBIDF (@Electronic Components) experienced а +33.47% price change this week, while KULR (@Electronic Components) price change was -11.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.23% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBIDF($8.34B) has a higher market cap than KULR($175M). IBIDF YTD gains are higher at: 85.428 vs. KULR (-85.035). IBIDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94.6B vs. KULR (-15.53M). IBIDF has more cash in the bank: 374B vs. KULR (20.6M). KULR has less debt than IBIDF: KULR (1.76M) vs IBIDF (343B). IBIDF has higher revenues than KULR: IBIDF (364B) vs KULR (13M).
IBIDFKULRIBIDF / KULR
Capitalization8.34B175M4,768%
EBITDA94.6B-15.53M-609,199%
Gain YTD85.428-85.035-100%
P/E Ratio37.74N/A-
Revenue364B13M2,800,000%
Total Cash374B20.6M1,815,534%
Total Debt343B1.76M19,455,474%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBIDF vs KULR: Fundamental Ratings
IBIDF
KULR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5016
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
1996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3764
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5041

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBIDF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as KULR (35). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew similarly to KULR’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KULR (100). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KULR (96). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew significantly faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as KULR (64). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew similarly to KULR’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KULR (100). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew significantly faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IBIDFKULR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IBIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KULR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSSC75.130.74
+0.99%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
IWO319.193.07
+0.97%
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
PPTY30.810.22
+0.71%
Vident U.S. Diversified Real Estate ETF
KQQQ29.050.10
+0.33%
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
BJUN45.610.14
+0.31%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - June

IBIDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBIDF and KULR have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBIDF and KULR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBIDF
1D Price
Change %
IBIDF100%
-7.26%
KULR - IBIDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
JNPKF - IBIDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - IBIDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - IBIDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGBLY - IBIDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KULR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KULR and OUST have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KULR and OUST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KULR
1D Price
Change %
KULR100%
-2.52%
OUST - KULR
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
JBL - KULR
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
MTEK - KULR
26%
Poorly correlated
+21.80%
FLEX - KULR
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
VICR - KULR
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.65%
More