IBIDF
Price
$57.39
Change
-$4.49 (-7.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
15.08B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KGBLY
Price
$15.31
Change
-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBIDF vs KGBLY

Header iconIBIDF vs KGBLY Comparison
Open Charts IBIDF vs KGBLYBanner chart's image
Ibiden
Price$57.39
Change-$4.49 (-7.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization15.08B
Kingboard Laminates Holdings
Price$15.31
Change-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Volume$2.79K
Capitalization6.02B
IBIDF vs KGBLY Comparison Chart in %
IBIDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGBLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IBIDF vs. KGBLY commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBIDF is a Buy and KGBLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (IBIDF: $40.50 vs. KGBLY: $39.14)
Brand notoriety: IBIDF and KGBLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBIDF: 149% vs. KGBLY: 100%
Market capitalization -- IBIDF: $15.08B vs. KGBLY: $6.02B
IBIDF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $15.08B. KGBLY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $180.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $9.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBIDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKGBLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IBIDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • KGBLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBIDF is a better buy in the long-term than KGBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IBIDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGBLY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IBIDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • KGBLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IBIDF is a better buy in the short-term than KGBLY.

Price Growth

IBIDF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGBLY (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-2.30% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBIDF($15.1B) has a higher market cap than KGBLY($6.02B). IBIDF has higher P/E ratio than KGBLY: IBIDF (53.18) vs KGBLY (25.47). IBIDF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. KGBLY (-2.401). IBIDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 114B vs. KGBLY (2.14B). IBIDF has higher revenues than KGBLY: IBIDF (383B) vs KGBLY (19.5B).
IBIDFKGBLYIBIDF / KGBLY
Capitalization15.1B6.02B251%
EBITDA114B2.14B5,335%
Gain YTD0.000-2.401-
P/E Ratio53.1825.47209%
Revenue383B19.5B1,964%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBIDF vs KGBLY: Fundamental Ratings
IBIDF
KGBLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4931
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4854
SMR RATING
1..100
1294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
741
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a26

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGBLY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as IBIDF (29). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew similarly to IBIDF’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as KGBLY (54). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew similarly to KGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KGBLY (94). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew significantly faster than KGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

KGBLY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IBIDF (38). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew similarly to IBIDF’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGBLY (41). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IBIDFKGBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IBIDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGBLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVSD78.150.25
+0.32%
Avantis Responsible International Eq ETF
YALL43.910.06
+0.14%
God Bless America ETF
OCTQ23.88N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October
BSCS20.58-0.01
-0.05%
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corp Bd ETF
GRW29.95-0.83
-2.71%
TCW Durable Growth ETF

IBIDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBIDF and HNHPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBIDF and HNHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBIDF
1D Price
Change %
IBIDF100%
N/A
HNHPF - IBIDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
IEHC - IBIDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
KULR - IBIDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.08%
KGBLY - IBIDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - IBIDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGBLY and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGBLY and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGBLY
1D Price
Change %
KGBLY100%
N/A
IEHC - KGBLY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
KULR - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.08%
IBIDF - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More