Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBALX vs RLBFX
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBALX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced A
Price$37.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.83
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBALX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBALX is a Buy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. IBALX (1.52B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBALX: RLBFX (1.93) vs IBALX (1.36). IBALX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBALX (31 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). IBALX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBALX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBALX: RLBFX (250) vs IBALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. IBALX (2.90). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.86 vs. IBALX (21.30).
| IBALX | RLBFX | IBALX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.164 | 16.889 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 271B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.93 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.90 | 9.63 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.69 | 41.38 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.30 | 40.86 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.93 | 77.79 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement