Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBALX vs RLBFX
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBALX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced A
Price$37.09
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBALX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBALX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. IBALX (1.5B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBALX: RLBFX (2.00) vs IBALX (1.39). IBALX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBALX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IBALX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBALX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBALX: RLBFX (250) vs IBALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. IBALX (3.57). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. IBALX (23.88).
| IBALX | RLBFX | IBALX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.790 | 14.890 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 265B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 2.00 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 9.05 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.85 | 51.85 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.88 | 43.90 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.81 | 78.80 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement