Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBALX vs RLBFX
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBALX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced A
Price$37.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBALX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBALX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. IBALX (1.52B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBALX: RLBFX (1.97) vs IBALX (1.37). IBALX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBALX (31 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). IBALX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBALX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBALX: RLBFX (250) vs IBALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. IBALX (4.04). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. IBALX (23.40).
| IBALX | RLBFX | IBALX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.462 | 16.507 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 268B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.97 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.04 | 10.28 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.22 | 44.74 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.40 | 43.06 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.86 | 81.39 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement