Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBALX vs RLBFX
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBALX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced A
Price$36.22
Change+$0.10 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.71
Change+$0.13 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBALX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBALX is a Hold and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. IBALX (1.52B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBALX: RLBFX (1.93) vs IBALX (1.36). IBALX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBALX (31 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). IBALX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBALX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBALX: RLBFX (250) vs IBALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.43 vs. IBALX (6.56). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.27 vs. IBALX (20.82).
| IBALX | RLBFX | IBALX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.191 | 10.862 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.93 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 9.43 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 38.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.82 | 36.27 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.77 | 77.06 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement