Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBALX vs RLBAX
IBALX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts IBALX vs RLBAX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced A
Price$35.92
Change+$0.10 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
IBALX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBALX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBALX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. IBALX (1.45B). IBALX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: IBALX (1.51) vs RLBAX (1.18). IBALX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: IBALX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than IBALX (0.97). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBALX (41.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBALX: RLBAX (250) vs IBALX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. IBALX (5.94). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. IBALX (25.51).
| IBALX | RLBAX | IBALX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.897 | 8.565 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.18 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | 9.42 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.84 | 32.14 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.51 | 35.28 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.00 | 58.06 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement