IBAC
Price
$10.55
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
166.15M
NETDU
Price
$11.44
Change
+$0.13 (+1.15%)
Updated
Sep 3, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBAC vs NETDU

Header iconIBAC vs NETDU Comparison
Open Charts IBAC vs NETDUBanner chart's image
IB Acquisition
Price$10.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$25.12K
Capitalization166.15M
Nabors Energy Transition
Price$11.44
Change+$0.13 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
IBAC vs NETDU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IBAC vs. NETDU commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBAC is a StrongBuy and NETDU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (IBAC: $10.55 vs. NETDU: $11.31)
Brand notoriety: IBAC and NETDU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBAC: 507% vs. NETDU: 102%
Market capitalization -- IBAC: $166.15M vs. NETDU: $0
IBAC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $166.15M. NETDU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.13M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNETDU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IBAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NETDU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NETDU is a better buy in the long-term than IBAC.

Price Growth

IBAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while NETDU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.35% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NETDU (4.336) and IBAC (4.198) have similar YTD gains . IBAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -677.59K vs. NETDU (-7.15M). NETDU has more cash in the bank: 1.18M vs. IBAC (486K). IBAC has less debt than NETDU: IBAC (148K) vs NETDU (3.05M). IBAC (0) and NETDU (0) have equivalent revenues.
IBACNETDUIBAC / NETDU
Capitalization166MN/A-
EBITDA-677.59K-7.15M9%
Gain YTD4.1984.33697%
P/E Ratio43.96N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash486K1.18M41%
Total Debt148K3.05M5%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NETDU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUNDX27.900.51
+1.86%
Mundoval
BPTIX212.111.07
+0.51%
Baron Partners Institutional
SFILX15.830.06
+0.38%
Schwab Fundamental Intl Sm Eq Idx
RINCX19.240.03
+0.16%
Victory RS Science and Technology C
CLSPX31.71N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I

IBAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBAC and LEGT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBAC and LEGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBAC
1D Price
Change %
IBAC100%
+0.09%
LEGT - IBAC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
NETDU - IBAC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHAU - IBAC
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFJK - IBAC
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
ALFUU - IBAC
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More

NETDU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NETDU has been loosely correlated with FGMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NETDU jumps, then FGMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NETDU
1D Price
Change %
NETDU100%
N/A
FGMC - NETDU
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CHACU - NETDU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBAC - NETDU
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
GPAT - NETDU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMAC - NETDU
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More