IAUGF
Price
$5.87
Change
+$0.45 (+8.30%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
9.69B
NHOLF
Price
$32.99
Change
+$2.84 (+9.42%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
14.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IAUGF vs NHOLF

Header iconIAUGF vs NHOLF Comparison
Open Charts IAUGF vs NHOLFBanner chart's image
Insurance Australia Group
Price$5.87
Change+$0.45 (+8.30%)
Volume$196
Capitalization9.69B
Sompo
Price$32.99
Change+$2.84 (+9.42%)
Volume$339
Capitalization14.87B
IAUGF vs NHOLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IAUGF vs. NHOLF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IAUGF is a Hold and NHOLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IAUGF: $5.87 vs. NHOLF: $32.99)
Brand notoriety: IAUGF and NHOLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IAUGF: 6% vs. NHOLF: 80%
Market capitalization -- IAUGF: $9.69B vs. NHOLF: $14.87B
IAUGF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $9.69B. NHOLF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $14.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IAUGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNHOLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IAUGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NHOLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NHOLF is a better buy in the long-term than IAUGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IAUGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NHOLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IAUGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NHOLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IAUGF is a better buy in the short-term than NHOLF.

Price Growth

IAUGF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NHOLF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.72% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHOLF($14.9B) has a higher market cap than IAUGF($9.69B). IAUGF (24.27) and NHOLF (23.26) have similar P/E ratio . NHOLF YTD gains are higher at: 31.801 vs. IAUGF (8.895). NHOLF has more cash in the bank: 1.25T vs. IAUGF (350M). IAUGF has less debt than NHOLF: IAUGF (2.55B) vs NHOLF (609B). NHOLF has higher revenues than IAUGF: NHOLF (4.49T) vs IAUGF (9.17B).
IAUGFNHOLFIAUGF / NHOLF
Capitalization9.69B14.9B65%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.89531.80128%
P/E Ratio24.2723.26104%
Revenue9.17B4.49T0%
Total Cash350M1.25T0%
Total Debt2.55B609B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IAUGF vs NHOLF: Fundamental Ratings
IAUGF
NHOLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5018
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
736
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NHOLF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUGF (60). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew similarly to IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

NHOLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUGF (50). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew similarly to IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

IAUGF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as NHOLF (100). This means that IAUGF’s stock grew similarly to NHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

NHOLF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUGF (47). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew similarly to IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

NHOLF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IAUGF (73). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew significantly faster than IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IAUGFNHOLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLUR.X0.0706580.001514
+2.19%
Blur cryptocurrency
BAL.X0.9713010.018299
+1.92%
Balancer cryptocurrency
GHST.X0.3681210.006698
+1.85%
Aavegotchi cryptocurrency
ALGO.X0.1770680.002428
+1.39%
Algorand cryptocurrency
UFT.X0.004146-0.000194
-4.47%
UniLend cryptocurrency

IAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAUGF and IFCZF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAUGF and IFCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAUGF
1D Price
Change %
IAUGF100%
N/A
IFCZF - IAUGF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
PPCCY - IAUGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+5.14%
MSADF - IAUGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MURGF - IAUGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
NHOLF - IAUGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NHOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHOLF and PZAKY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHOLF and PZAKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHOLF
1D Price
Change %
NHOLF100%
N/A
PZAKY - NHOLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPCCY - NHOLF
16%
Poorly correlated
+5.14%
MSADY - NHOLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
IAUGY - NHOLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUGF - NHOLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More