IAFNF
Price
$92.28
Change
-$1.29 (-1.38%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
MPFRF
Price
$2.67
Change
+$0.34 (+14.66%)
Updated
Nov 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

IAFNF vs MPFRF

Header iconIAFNF vs MPFRF Comparison
Open Charts IAFNF vs MPFRFBanner chart's image
IA FINL
Price$92.28
Change-$1.29 (-1.38%)
Volume$107
CapitalizationN/A
Mapfre SA
Price$2.67
Change+$0.34 (+14.66%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
IAFNF vs MPFRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IAFNF vs. MPFRF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IAFNF is a Hold and MPFRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (IAFNF: $92.28 vs. MPFRF: $2.66)
Brand notoriety: IAFNF and MPFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IAFNF: 2% vs. MPFRF: 31%
Market capitalization -- IAFNF: $7.14B vs. MPFRF: $6.38B
IAFNF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $7.14B. MPFRF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $6.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IAFNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMPFRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IAFNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MPFRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IAFNF is a better buy in the long-term than MPFRF.

Price Growth

IAFNF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -3.97% price change this week, while MPFRF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-2.82% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IAFNF($7.14B) has a higher market cap than MPFRF($6.39B). IAFNF (8.68) and MPFRF (8.55) have similar P/E ratio . MPFRF YTD gains are higher at: 41.005 vs. IAFNF (33.739). MPFRF (1.99B) and IAFNF (1.95B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . IAFNF has less debt than MPFRF: IAFNF (1.5B) vs MPFRF (3.32B). MPFRF has higher revenues than IAFNF: MPFRF (22.3B) vs IAFNF (12.9B).
IAFNFMPFRFIAFNF / MPFRF
Capitalization7.14B6.39B112%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.73941.00582%
P/E Ratio8.688.55101%
Revenue12.9B22.3B58%
Total Cash1.95B1.99B98%
Total Debt1.5B3.32B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPFRF: Fundamental Ratings
MPFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

IAFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAFNF and AXAHY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAFNF and AXAHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAFNF
1D Price
Change %
IAFNF100%
N/A
AXAHY - IAFNF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
AXAHF - IAFNF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
MPFRF - IAFNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBSEY - IAFNF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
BLHEY - IAFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MPFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPFRF and SUND have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPFRF and SUND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPFRF
1D Price
Change %
MPFRF100%
N/A
SUND - MPFRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.14%
BLHEY - MPFRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXAHY - MPFRF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
IAFNF - MPFRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIISY - MPFRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More