IACYF
Price
$9.88
Change
-$0.54 (-5.18%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
MNBEF
Price
$16.37
Change
+$0.63 (+4.00%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Ad is loading...

IACYF vs MNBEF

Header iconIACYF vs MNBEF Comparison
Open Charts IACYF vs MNBEFBanner chart's image
Inter Action Corp. Yokohama
Price$9.88
Change-$0.54 (-5.18%)
Volume$2
CapitalizationN/A
Minebea Mitsumi
Price$16.37
Change+$0.63 (+4.00%)
Volume$186
CapitalizationN/A
IACYF vs MNBEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IACYF vs. MNBEF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IACYF is a Hold and MNBEF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (IACYF: $9.88 vs. MNBEF: $16.37)
Brand notoriety: IACYF and MNBEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IACYF: 100% vs. MNBEF: 116%
Market capitalization -- IACYF: $69.79M vs. MNBEF: $6.59B
IACYF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $69.79M. MNBEF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $6.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $84.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IACYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNBEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IACYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNBEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IACYF is a better buy in the long-term than MNBEF.

Price Growth

IACYF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNBEF (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+0.17% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNBEF($6.59B) has a higher market cap than IACYF($69.8M). MNBEF has higher P/E ratio than IACYF: MNBEF (17.07) vs IACYF (13.61). IACYF YTD gains are higher at: 29.999 vs. MNBEF (-17.780).
IACYFMNBEFIACYF / MNBEF
Capitalization69.8M6.59B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.999-17.780-169%
P/E Ratio13.6117.0780%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNBEF: Fundamental Ratings
MNBEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

IACYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IACYF and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IACYF and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IACYF
1D Price
Change %
IACYF100%
N/A
IEHC - IACYF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBIDF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGBLY - IACYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNBEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNBEF and JNNDF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNBEF and JNNDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNBEF
1D Price
Change %
MNBEF100%
N/A
JNNDF - MNBEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRSEF - MNBEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEHC - MNBEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
JPDYY - MNBEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBIDF - MNBEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More