IACYF
Price
$9.88
Change
-$0.54 (-5.18%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
100.17M
KGBLY
Price
$15.31
Change
-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IACYF vs KGBLY

Header iconIACYF vs KGBLY Comparison
Open Charts IACYF vs KGBLYBanner chart's image
Inter Action Corp. Yokohama
Price$9.88
Change-$0.54 (-5.18%)
Volume$2
Capitalization100.17M
Kingboard Laminates Holdings
Price$15.31
Change-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Volume$2.79K
Capitalization4.23B
IACYF vs KGBLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IACYF vs. KGBLY commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IACYF is a Hold and KGBLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (IACYF: $9.88 vs. KGBLY: $12.76)
Brand notoriety: IACYF and KGBLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IACYF: 100% vs. KGBLY: 100%
Market capitalization -- IACYF: $100.17M vs. KGBLY: $4.23B
IACYF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $100.17M. KGBLY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $119.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IACYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGBLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IACYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KGBLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IACYF is a better buy in the long-term than KGBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGBLY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KGBLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

IACYF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGBLY (@Electronic Components) price change was -16.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+0.44% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGBLY($4.23B) has a higher market cap than IACYF($100M). IACYF has higher P/E ratio than KGBLY: IACYF (13.61) vs KGBLY (11.31). IACYF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. KGBLY (-19.378).
IACYFKGBLYIACYF / KGBLY
Capitalization100M4.23B2%
EBITDA2.56BN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-19.378-
P/E Ratio13.6111.31120%
Revenue8.82BN/A-
Total Cash8.31BN/A-
Total Debt777MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IACYFKGBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGTDX63.910.76
+1.20%
Putnam Global Technology C
OPOCX99.601.16
+1.18%
Invesco Discovery A
CCGEX14.060.11
+0.79%
Calamos Global Equity C
TOCQX50.560.32
+0.64%
Tocqueville
LRAGX16.020.03
+0.19%
Lord Abbett International Growth R3

IACYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IACYF and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IACYF and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IACYF
1D Price
Change %
IACYF100%
N/A
IEHC - IACYF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBIDF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
KGBLY - IACYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGBLY and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGBLY and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGBLY
1D Price
Change %
KGBLY100%
N/A
IEHC - KGBLY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - KGBLY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBIDF - KGBLY
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More