IACYF vs KGBLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IACYF is a Hold and KGBLY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IACYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKGBLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IACYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KGBLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
IACYF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGBLY (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.41%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+0.17% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| IACYF | KGBLY | IACYF / KGBLY | |
| Capitalization | 69.8M | 2.7B | 3% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.999 | -9.480 | -316% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.61 | 15.17 | 90% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
IACYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IACYF and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IACYF and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IACYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IACYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IEHC - IACYF | 2% Poorly correlated | -4.35% | ||
| JNPKF - IACYF | 0% Poorly correlated | -14.13% | ||
| MNBEF - IACYF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IBIDF - IACYF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KGBLY - IACYF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
KGBLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KGBLY and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGBLY and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KGBLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGBLY | 100% | N/A | ||
| IEHC - KGBLY | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.35% | ||
| JNPKF - KGBLY | 0% Poorly correlated | -14.13% | ||
| MNBEF - KGBLY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IACYF - KGBLY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IBIDF - KGBLY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||