It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HZO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HZO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HZO (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while RMBL (@Specialty Stores) price change was +17.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.02%.
HZO is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
RMBL is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
HZO | RMBL | HZO / RMBL | |
Capitalization | 742M | 227M | 327% |
EBITDA | 226M | -55.9M | -404% |
Gain YTD | -26.324 | -30.590 | 86% |
P/E Ratio | 8.24 | 1.10 | 752% |
Revenue | 2.41B | 1.37B | 177% |
Total Cash | 210M | 58.9M | 357% |
Total Debt | 1.22B | 772M | 158% |
HZO | RMBL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RMBL's Valuation (48) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HZO (57) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RMBL’s stock grew similarly to HZO’s over the last 12 months.
HZO's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
HZO's SMR Rating (85) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
RMBL's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HZO (79) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RMBL’s stock grew similarly to HZO’s over the last 12 months.
HZO's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
HZO | RMBL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 4 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 4 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 4 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 4 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 4 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 4 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago74% | 9 days ago89% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 4 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HZO has been closely correlated with ONEW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HZO jumps, then ONEW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HZO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HZO | 100% | +0.42% | ||
ONEW - HZO | 73% Closely correlated | +3.45% | ||
ABG - HZO | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
KMX - HZO | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
AN - HZO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
CRMT - HZO | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBL has been loosely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBL jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMBL | 100% | +8.24% | ||
ABG - RMBL | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
ONEW - RMBL | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
ARKO - RMBL | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
HZO - RMBL | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
KMX - RMBL | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
More |