HZO
Price
$23.04
Change
+$0.57 (+2.54%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
494.52M
78 days until earnings call
MTAGF
Price
$4.96
Change
+$2.26 (+83.70%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HZO vs MTAGF

Header iconHZO vs MTAGF Comparison
Open Charts HZO vs MTAGFBanner chart's image
MarineMax
Price$23.04
Change+$0.57 (+2.54%)
Volume$346.92K
Capitalization494.52M
Ceconomy AG
Price$4.96
Change+$2.26 (+83.70%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.52B
HZO vs MTAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HZO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HZO vs. MTAGF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HZO is a Buy and MTAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (HZO: $23.04 vs. MTAGF: $4.96)
Brand notoriety: HZO and MTAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HZO: 95% vs. MTAGF: 4%
Market capitalization -- HZO: $494.52M vs. MTAGF: $2.52B
HZO [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $494.52M. MTAGF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $2.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $48.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HZO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTAGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HZO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTAGF is a better buy in the long-term than HZO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HZO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTAGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HZO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MTAGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTAGF is a better buy in the short-term than HZO.

Price Growth

HZO (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while MTAGF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

HZO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.65% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTAGF($2.52B) has a higher market cap than HZO($495M). MTAGF has higher P/E ratio than HZO: MTAGF (15.63) vs HZO (11.15). MTAGF YTD gains are higher at: 59.496 vs. HZO (-20.415). MTAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 981M vs. HZO (94.8M). MTAGF has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. HZO (151M). HZO has less debt than MTAGF: HZO (1.27B) vs MTAGF (2.56B). MTAGF has higher revenues than HZO: MTAGF (22.9B) vs HZO (2.32B).
HZOMTAGFHZO / MTAGF
Capitalization495M2.52B20%
EBITDA94.8M981M10%
Gain YTD-20.41559.496-34%
P/E Ratio11.1515.6371%
Revenue2.32B22.9B10%
Total Cash151M931M16%
Total Debt1.27B2.56B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HZO vs MTAGF: Fundamental Ratings
HZO
MTAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
9293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6034
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTAGF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HZO (44) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MTAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HZO’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as HZO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to HZO’s over the last 12 months.

HZO's SMR Rating (92) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MTAGF (93) in the null industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to MTAGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as HZO (64) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to HZO’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HZO (60) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to HZO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HZOMTAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HZO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSEFX39.460.34
+0.87%
Domini Impact Equity Investor
IHOTX22.760.09
+0.40%
Hartford International Opportunities R5
FTHMX26.770.10
+0.37%
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Eq Inst
HULIX34.090.09
+0.26%
Huber Select Large Cap Value Inv
RIRHX77.330.15
+0.19%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R5E

HZO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HZO has been loosely correlated with ONEW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HZO jumps, then ONEW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HZO
1D Price
Change %
HZO100%
+2.54%
ONEW - HZO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
CWH - HZO
62%
Loosely correlated
+4.27%
AN - HZO
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
HVT - HZO
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
PAG - HZO
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More

MTAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTAGF has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTAGF jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTAGF
1D Price
Change %
MTAGF100%
N/A
HZO - MTAGF
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
ONEW - MTAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.24%
MTTRY - MTAGF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
PAHGF - MTAGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPTF - MTAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More