Advertisement
HZO vs MTAGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HZO is a Hold and MTAGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HZO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTAGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HZO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MTAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HZO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- HZO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HZO (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -6.66% price change this week, while MTAGF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
HZO is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+0.88% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| HZO | MTAGF | HZO / MTAGF | |
| Capitalization | 742M | 1.46B | 51% |
| EBITDA | 226M | 932M | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -16.235 | -13.178 | 123% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.24 | 11.22 | 73% |
| Revenue | 2.41B | 21.7B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 210M | 1.13B | 19% |
| Total Debt | 1.22B | 2.67B | 46% |
HZO | MTAGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTAGF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HZO (45) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MTAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HZO’s over the last 12 months.
HZO's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MTAGF (100) in the null industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to MTAGF’s over the last 12 months.
HZO's SMR Rating (81) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MTAGF (92) in the null industry. This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to MTAGF’s over the last 12 months.
MTAGF's Price Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as HZO (96) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to HZO’s over the last 12 months.
MTAGF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HZO (73) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MTAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HZO’s over the last 12 months.
| HZO | MTAGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 14% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 13% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SSAIX | 13.41 | 0.10 | +0.75% |
| State Street International Stock Sel N | |||
| AAISX | 19.07 | 0.11 | +0.58% |
| American Beacon International Eq Adv | |||
| PGRKX | 9.58 | 0.05 | +0.52% |
| Principal Global Real Estate Sec R3 | |||
| ATHYX | 31.07 | -0.22 | -0.70% |
| American Century Heritage Y | |||
| IDPSX | 61.90 | -0.56 | -0.90% |
| ProFunds Industrial Ultra Sector Svc | |||
HZO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HZO has been loosely correlated with ONEW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HZO jumps, then ONEW could also see price increases.
MTAGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTAGF has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTAGF jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTAGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTAGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HZO - MTAGF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ONEW - MTAGF | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
| MTTRY - MTAGF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PAHGF - MTAGF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTPTF - MTAGF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||