HYTLF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.22M
SJT
Price
$5.81
Change
-$0.16 (-2.68%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
246.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYTLF vs SJT

Header iconHYTLF vs SJT Comparison
Open Charts HYTLF vs SJTBanner chart's image
HYTERRA
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$42.64K
Capitalization8.22M
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust UBI
Price$5.81
Change-$0.16 (-2.68%)
Volume$251.2K
Capitalization246.56M
HYTLF vs SJT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HYTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYTLF vs. SJT commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYTLF is a Hold and SJT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (HYTLF: $0.03 vs. SJT: $5.81)
Brand notoriety: HYTLF and SJT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYTLF: 20% vs. SJT: 82%
Market capitalization -- HYTLF: $8.22M vs. SJT: $246.56M
HYTLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $8.22M. SJT’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $246.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYTLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSJT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HYTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SJT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SJT is a better buy in the long-term than HYTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYTLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYTLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SJT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HYTLF and SJT are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HYTLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.52% price change this week, while SJT (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -3.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.04% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SJT($247M) has a higher market cap than HYTLF($8.22M). SJT YTD gains are higher at: 51.697 vs. HYTLF (-15.429). SJT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 76.6M vs. HYTLF (-326.33K). SJT has higher revenues than HYTLF: SJT (78.3M) vs HYTLF (52).
HYTLFSJTHYTLF / SJT
Capitalization8.22M247M3%
EBITDA-326.33K76.6M-0%
Gain YTD-15.42951.697-30%
P/E RatioN/A3.32-
Revenue5278.3M0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYTLF vs SJT: Fundamental Ratings
HYTLF
SJT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
9124
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
971
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HYTLF's Valuation (49) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SJT (100) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that HYTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SJT’s over the last 12 months.

SJT's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYTLF (100) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that SJT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.

SJT's SMR Rating (24) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYTLF (91) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that SJT’s stock grew significantly faster than HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HYTLF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SJT (46) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that HYTLF’s stock grew similarly to SJT’s over the last 12 months.

SJT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYTLF (97) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that SJT’s stock grew significantly faster than HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYTLFSJT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BPOSY2.57N/A
N/A
Bpost SA
IMIAF27.60N/A
N/A
IMI plc
FWFW0.13N/A
N/A
Flywheel Advanced Technology Inc.
BDWBY3.93-0.02
-0.63%
BUDWEISER BREWING CO APAC LTD.
DTZZF0.03N/A
-6.78%
Dotz Nano Ltd.

HYTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYTLF and KOS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYTLF and KOS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYTLF
1D Price
Change %
HYTLF100%
-1.33%
KOS - HYTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
REI - HYTLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
SJT - HYTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
SM - HYTLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
WTI - HYTLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SJT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJT has been loosely correlated with MGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJT jumps, then MGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJT
1D Price
Change %
SJT100%
-2.68%
MGY - SJT
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
CIVI - SJT
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
OVV - SJT
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
REPX - SJT
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
SD - SJT
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More