HYPRF
Price
$0.95
Change
-$0.05 (-5.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
132.61M
SHLAF
Price
$278.43
Change
+$4.42 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
25.35B
Ad is loading...

HYPRF vs SHLAF

Header iconHYPRF vs SHLAF Comparison
Open Charts HYPRF vs SHLAFBanner chart's image
Hydrogenpro AS
Price$0.95
Change-$0.05 (-5.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization132.61M
Schindler Holding AG
Price$278.43
Change+$4.42 (+1.61%)
Volume$5
Capitalization25.35B
HYPRF vs SHLAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYPRF vs. SHLAF commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYPRF is a Hold and SHLAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (HYPRF: $0.95 vs. SHLAF: $278.42)
Brand notoriety: HYPRF and SHLAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYPRF: 100% vs. SHLAF: 52%
Market capitalization -- HYPRF: $132.61M vs. SHLAF: $25.35B
HYPRF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $132.61M. SHLAF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $25.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYPRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHLAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HYPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHLAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHLAF is a better buy in the long-term than HYPRF.

Price Growth

HYPRF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHLAF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+3.04% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHLAF($25.4B) has a higher market cap than HYPRF($133M). SHLAF YTD gains are higher at: 0.979 vs. HYPRF (0.000). SHLAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.44B vs. HYPRF (-61.67M). SHLAF has more cash in the bank: 3.04B vs. HYPRF (208M). HYPRF has less debt than SHLAF: HYPRF (16.7M) vs SHLAF (658M). SHLAF has higher revenues than HYPRF: SHLAF (11.7B) vs HYPRF (131M).
HYPRFSHLAFHYPRF / SHLAF
Capitalization133M25.4B1%
EBITDA-61.67M1.44B-4%
Gain YTD0.0000.979-
P/E RatioN/A29.50-
Revenue131M11.7B1%
Total Cash208M3.04B7%
Total Debt16.7M658M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHLAF: Fundamental Ratings
SHLAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

HYPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYPRF has been loosely correlated with RRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYPRF jumps, then RRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYPRF
1D Price
Change %
HYPRF100%
N/A
RRX - HYPRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.55%
HSHZY - HYPRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHLAF - HYPRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
DURYY - HYPRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JCSE - HYPRF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
More

SHLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHLAF and HYPRF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHLAF and HYPRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHLAF
1D Price
Change %
SHLAF100%
+1.61%
HYPRF - SHLAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMROF - SHLAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUQVF - SHLAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUUMF - SHLAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHLRF - SHLAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More