HYMC
Price
$3.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
46.42M
MAG
Price
$21.63
Change
+$0.26 (+1.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYMC vs MAG

Header iconHYMC vs MAG Comparison
Open Charts HYMC vs MAGBanner chart's image
Hycroft Mining Holding
Price$3.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$421.84K
Capitalization46.42M
MAG Silver
Price$21.63
Change+$0.26 (+1.22%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization1.12B
HYMC vs MAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYMC vs. MAG commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYMC is a Hold and MAG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HYMC: $3.14 vs. MAG: $21.63)
Brand notoriety: HYMC and MAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYMC: 81% vs. MAG: 49%
Market capitalization -- HYMC: $46.42M vs. MAG: $1.12B
HYMC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $46.42M. MAG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYMC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HYMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the long-term than HYMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYMC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYMC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the short-term than HYMC.

Price Growth

HYMC (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.18% price change this week, while MAG (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.25% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAG($1.12B) has a higher market cap than HYMC($46.4M). MAG has higher P/E ratio than HYMC: MAG (22.98) vs HYMC (3.75). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 62.765 vs. HYMC (42.081). MAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -13.89M vs. HYMC (-34.21M). HYMC has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. MAG (68.7M). MAG has less debt than HYMC: MAG (154K) vs HYMC (145M). HYMC (0) and MAG (0) have equivalent revenues.
HYMCMAGHYMC / MAG
Capitalization46.4M1.12B4%
EBITDA-34.21M-13.89M246%
Gain YTD42.08162.76567%
P/E Ratio3.7522.9816%
Revenue00-
Total Cash106M68.7M154%
Total Debt145M154K94,156%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYMC vs MAG: Fundamental Ratings
HYMC
MAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
9950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
241
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAG's Valuation (78) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HYMC (84) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to HYMC’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYMC (100) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYMC’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYMC (99) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYMC’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HYMC (49) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to HYMC’s over the last 12 months.

HYMC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAG (41) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HYMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYMCMAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCID2.160.11
+5.37%
Lucid Group
VSCO20.570.17
+0.83%
Victoria's Secret & Co
ATNM1.440.01
+0.70%
Actinium Pharmaceuticals
NVO69.17-0.65
-0.93%
Novo-Nordisk A/S
NKTR24.76-0.77
-3.02%
Nektar Therapeutics

HYMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYMC has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYMC jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYMC
1D Price
Change %
HYMC100%
N/A
HL - HYMC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
EXK - HYMC
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CDE - HYMC
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
MAG - HYMC
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
AG - HYMC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
More

MAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAG has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAG jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAG
1D Price
Change %
MAG100%
+1.22%
CDE - MAG
79%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
AG - MAG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
HL - MAG
77%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
PAAS - MAG
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
EXK - MAG
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
More