HYLN
Price
$1.45
Change
-$0.06 (-3.97%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
348.1M
59 days until earnings call
QS
Price
$4.34
Change
-$0.15 (-3.34%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.04B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYLN vs QS

Header iconHYLN vs QS Comparison
Open Charts HYLN vs QSBanner chart's image
Hyliion Holdings
Price$1.45
Change-$0.06 (-3.97%)
Volume$736.52K
Capitalization348.1M
QuantumScape
Price$4.34
Change-$0.15 (-3.34%)
Volume$8.64M
Capitalization3.04B
HYLN vs QS Comparison Chart
Loading...
HYLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYLN vs. QS commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYLN is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (HYLN: $1.45 vs. QS: $4.34)
Brand notoriety: HYLN and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYLN: 35% vs. QS: 77%
Market capitalization -- HYLN: $348.1M vs. QS: $3.04B
HYLN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $348.1M. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYLN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HYLN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HYLN and QS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYLN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYLN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than HYLN.

Price Growth

HYLN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -7.64% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +5.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

HYLN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

QS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.27% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.04B) has a higher market cap than HYLN($348M). QS YTD gains are higher at: -16.378 vs. HYLN (-44.444). HYLN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -122.38M vs. QS (-392.95M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. HYLN (163M). HYLN has less debt than QS: HYLN (7.64M) vs QS (101M). HYLN has higher revenues than QS: HYLN (672K) vs QS (0).
HYLNQSHYLN / QS
Capitalization348M3.04B11%
EBITDA-122.38M-392.95M31%
Gain YTD-44.444-16.378271%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue672K0-
Total Cash163M1.07B15%
Total Debt7.64M101M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYLN: Fundamental Ratings
HYLN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYLNQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MENAX8.92-0.01
-0.11%
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income A
DRGVX46.44-0.45
-0.96%
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund I
AICRX36.34-0.44
-1.20%
American Century Discplnd Cor Val R
ARAHX6.62-0.10
-1.49%
Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity A
STSAX6.80-0.12
-1.73%
Allspring Common Stock C

HYLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYLN has been loosely correlated with MNRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYLN jumps, then MNRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYLN
1D Price
Change %
HYLN100%
-3.97%
MNRO - HYLN
44%
Loosely correlated
-6.65%
MOD - HYLN
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.45%
AXL - HYLN
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.76%
QS - HYLN
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
ALSN - HYLN
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
More

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with THRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then THRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-3.34%
THRM - QS
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
VC - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
HYLN - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
ADNT - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
CPS - QS
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
More