HYLN
Price
$1.68
Change
-$0.22 (-11.58%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
294.73M
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLR
Price
$38.12
Change
-$0.18 (-0.47%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
435.77M
117 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYLN vs MLR

Header iconHYLN vs MLR Comparison
Open Charts HYLN vs MLRBanner chart's image
Hyliion Holdings
Price$1.68
Change-$0.22 (-11.58%)
Volume$2.97M
Capitalization294.73M
Miller Industries
Price$38.12
Change-$0.18 (-0.47%)
Volume$81.56K
Capitalization435.77M
HYLN vs MLR Comparison Chart in %
HYLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYLN vs. MLR commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYLN is a StrongBuy and MLR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (HYLN: $1.68 vs. MLR: $38.12)
Brand notoriety: HYLN and MLR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYLN: 169% vs. MLR: 90%
Market capitalization -- HYLN: $294.73M vs. MLR: $435.77M
HYLN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $294.73M. MLR’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $435.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYLN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HYLN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HYLN is a better buy in the long-term than MLR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYLN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYLN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MLR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLR is a better buy in the short-term than HYLN.

Price Growth

HYLN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -19.23% price change this week, while MLR (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

HYLN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

MLR is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.13% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLR($436M) has a higher market cap than HYLN($295M). HYLN YTD gains are higher at: -27.203 vs. MLR (-40.593). MLR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 70.1M vs. HYLN (-62.14M). HYLN has less debt than MLR: HYLN (5.61M) vs MLR (55.4M). MLR has higher revenues than HYLN: MLR (976M) vs HYLN (3.51M).
HYLNMLRHYLN / MLR
Capitalization295M436M68%
EBITDA-62.14M70.1M-89%
Gain YTD-27.203-40.59367%
P/E RatioN/A14.78-
Revenue3.51M976M0%
Total Cash109MN/A-
Total Debt5.61M55.4M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYLN vs MLR: Fundamental Ratings
HYLN
MLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
9568
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4580
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1424
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HYLN's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MLR (95) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that HYLN’s stock grew similarly to MLR’s over the last 12 months.

MLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as HYLN (100) in the null industry. This means that MLR’s stock grew similarly to HYLN’s over the last 12 months.

MLR's SMR Rating (68) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as HYLN (95) in the null industry. This means that MLR’s stock grew similarly to HYLN’s over the last 12 months.

HYLN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLR (80) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that HYLN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLR’s over the last 12 months.

HYLN's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as MLR (24) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that HYLN’s stock grew similarly to MLR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYLNMLR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNCFF78.921.92
+2.50%
UniCredito Spa
TPRKY8.270.13
+1.65%
Travis Perkins Plc
KLYCY9.15N/A
N/A
Kunlun Energy Co., Ltd.
CNBN26.89N/A
N/A
CNB Bank Shares, Inc.
HEEVF0.15N/A
N/A
HELIUM EVOLUTION INC.

HYLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYLN has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYLN jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYLN
1D Price
Change %
HYLN100%
-12.84%
AEVA - HYLN
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
MLR - HYLN
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
ATMU - HYLN
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
ALSN - HYLN
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
GGR - HYLN
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.99%
More

MLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLR has been loosely correlated with PHIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLR jumps, then PHIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLR
1D Price
Change %
MLR100%
+0.29%
PHIN - MLR
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
ALSN - MLR
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
PLOW - MLR
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
VC - MLR
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
APTV - MLR
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
More