HYHDF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.57M
MCQEF
Price
$141.94
Change
-$1.40 (-0.98%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
55.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYHDF vs MCQEF

Header iconHYHDF vs MCQEF Comparison
Open Charts HYHDF vs MCQEFBanner chart's image
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization11.57M
Macquarie Group
Price$141.94
Change-$1.40 (-0.98%)
Volume$144
Capitalization55.24B
HYHDF vs MCQEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYHDF vs. MCQEF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYHDF is a Hold and MCQEF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (HYHDF: $0.08 vs. MCQEF: $141.94)
Brand notoriety: HYHDF and MCQEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYHDF: 12% vs. MCQEF: 30%
Market capitalization -- HYHDF: $11.57M vs. MCQEF: $55.24B
HYHDF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $11.57M. MCQEF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $55.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCQEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCQEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCQEF is a better buy in the long-term than HYHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYHDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCQEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYHDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MCQEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCQEF is a better buy in the short-term than HYHDF.

Price Growth

HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -21.70% price change this week, while MCQEF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +12.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+12.34% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCQEF($55.2B) has a higher market cap than HYHDF($11.6M). MCQEF has higher P/E ratio than HYHDF: MCQEF (22.20) vs HYHDF (2.71). HYHDF YTD gains are higher at: 24.286 vs. MCQEF (5.519). MCQEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.5B vs. HYHDF (5.16M). MCQEF has more cash in the bank: 88B vs. HYHDF (19.3M). HYHDF has less debt than MCQEF: HYHDF (2.89M) vs MCQEF (330B). MCQEF has higher revenues than HYHDF: MCQEF (6.79B) vs HYHDF (8.4M).
HYHDFMCQEFHYHDF / MCQEF
Capitalization11.6M55.2B0%
EBITDA5.16M20.5B0%
Gain YTD24.2865.519440%
P/E Ratio2.7122.2012%
Revenue8.4M6.79B0%
Total Cash19.3M88B0%
Total Debt2.89M330B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYHDF vs MCQEF: Fundamental Ratings
HYHDF
MCQEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
788
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCQEF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYHDF (68). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYHDF (100). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYHDF (78). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew significantly faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MCQEF (58). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to MCQEF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCQEF (54). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCQEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYHDFMCQEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KMTS17.000.49
+2.97%
Kestra Medical Technologies, Ltd.
EPRX5.390.03
+0.56%
Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals
CORZ13.62N/A
N/A
Core Scientific
FANG138.71-4.03
-2.82%
Diamondback Energy
EHGO0.66-0.02
-3.49%
Eshallgo Inc.

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
N/A
JPXGY - HYHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
HKXCF - HYHDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCQEF - HYHDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAUSY - HYHDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCY - HYHDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More

MCQEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCQEF and MATH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCQEF and MATH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCQEF
1D Price
Change %
MCQEF100%
N/A
MATH - MCQEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
SRL - MCQEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - MCQEF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
MQBKY - MCQEF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
OSCUF - MCQEF
12%
Poorly correlated
+6.48%
More