HYHDF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
21.7M
MAUSY
Price
$9.57
Change
+$0.06 (+0.63%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYHDF vs MAUSY

Header iconHYHDF vs MAUSY Comparison
Open Charts HYHDF vs MAUSYBanner chart's image
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization21.7M
Matsui Securities
Price$9.57
Change+$0.06 (+0.63%)
Volume$164
Capitalization1.33B
HYHDF vs MAUSY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAUSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYHDF vs. MAUSY commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYHDF is a Hold and MAUSY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HYHDF: $0.14 vs. MAUSY: $9.57)
Brand notoriety: HYHDF and MAUSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYHDF: 24% vs. MAUSY: 30%
Market capitalization -- HYHDF: $21.7M vs. MAUSY: $1.33B
HYHDF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $21.7M. MAUSY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAUSY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAUSY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAUSY is a better buy in the long-term than HYHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYHDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAUSY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYHDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAUSY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAUSY is a better buy in the short-term than HYHDF.

Price Growth

HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while MAUSY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAUSY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAUSY($1.33B) has a higher market cap than HYHDF($21.7M). MAUSY has higher P/E ratio than HYHDF: MAUSY (17.30) vs HYHDF (1.22). HYHDF YTD gains are higher at: 122.222 vs. MAUSY (-6.861). HYHDF has less debt than MAUSY: HYHDF (5.94M) vs MAUSY (298B). MAUSY has higher revenues than HYHDF: MAUSY (37.9B) vs HYHDF (8.38M).
HYHDFMAUSYHYHDF / MAUSY
Capitalization21.7M1.33B2%
EBITDA1.25MN/A-
Gain YTD122.222-6.861-1,781%
P/E Ratio1.2217.307%
Revenue8.38M37.9B0%
Total Cash15.9MN/A-
Total Debt5.94M298B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYHDF vs MAUSY: Fundamental Ratings
HYHDF
MAUSY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
775
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
868
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a53

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAUSY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYHDF (70). This means that MAUSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

MAUSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (100). This means that MAUSY’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

MAUSY's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYHDF (77). This means that MAUSY’s stock grew significantly faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MAUSY (61). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to MAUSY’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAUSY (68). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAUSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYHDFMAUSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAUSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAMOX29.080.04
+0.14%
Cambiar Opportunity Inv
MWOJX65.33-0.09
-0.14%
MFS Global Growth R4
JGVVX47.46-0.07
-0.15%
JPMorgan Growth Advantage R6
FFALX16.84-0.04
-0.24%
Franklin Global Allocation A
SFDYX31.63-0.10
-0.32%
SEI Mid-Cap Y (SIMT)

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
+2.71%
JPXGY - HYHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
HKXCF - HYHDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
MCQEF - HYHDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
MAUSY - HYHDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCY - HYHDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More

MAUSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAUSY and AAMTF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAUSY and AAMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAUSY
1D Price
Change %
MAUSY100%
N/A
AAMTF - MAUSY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGHL - MAUSY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCY - MAUSY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
JPXGY - MAUSY
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
HYHDF - MAUSY
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More