HYHDF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
20.67M
IVTJF
Price
$7.24
Change
+$0.28 (+4.02%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYHDF vs IVTJF

Header iconHYHDF vs IVTJF Comparison
Open Charts HYHDF vs IVTJFBanner chart's image
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.75K
Capitalization20.67M
Investec
Price$7.24
Change+$0.28 (+4.02%)
Volume$197
Capitalization4.76B
HYHDF vs IVTJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVTJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYHDF vs. IVTJF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYHDF is a Hold and IVTJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (HYHDF: $0.14 vs. IVTJF: $7.24)
Brand notoriety: HYHDF and IVTJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYHDF: 7% vs. IVTJF: 54%
Market capitalization -- HYHDF: $20.67M vs. IVTJF: $4.76B
HYHDF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $20.67M. IVTJF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIVTJF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IVTJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVTJF is a better buy in the long-term than HYHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYHDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVTJF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYHDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IVTJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVTJF is a better buy in the short-term than HYHDF.

Price Growth

HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -10.70% price change this week, while IVTJF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +5.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+5.27% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVTJF($4.76B) has a higher market cap than HYHDF($20.7M). IVTJF has higher P/E ratio than HYHDF: IVTJF (7.71) vs HYHDF (1.22). HYHDF YTD gains are higher at: 123.968 vs. IVTJF (-3.301). HYHDF has less debt than IVTJF: HYHDF (5.94M) vs IVTJF (2.47B). IVTJF has higher revenues than HYHDF: IVTJF (2.06B) vs HYHDF (8.38M).
HYHDFIVTJFHYHDF / IVTJF
Capitalization20.7M4.76B0%
EBITDA1.25MN/A-
Gain YTD123.968-3.301-3,755%
P/E Ratio1.227.7116%
Revenue8.38M2.06B0%
Total Cash15.9MN/A-
Total Debt5.94M2.47B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYHDF vs IVTJF: Fundamental Ratings
HYHDF
IVTJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
7712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
967
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVTJF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYHDF (71). This means that IVTJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

IVTJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYHDF (100). This means that IVTJF’s stock grew significantly faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

IVTJF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYHDF (77). This means that IVTJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as IVTJF (49). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to IVTJF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVTJF (67). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVTJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYHDFIVTJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVTJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSXLF0.270.01
+2.00%
GREAT PACIFIC GOLD CORP.
BNCDY38.850.35
+0.91%
Banca Mediolanum SPA
BRAGF6.10N/A
N/A
Bauer Ag
MHIFF0.05N/A
N/A
Mineral Hill Industries Ltd.
GRGDF20.96N/A
N/A
GROUPE DYNAMITE INC.

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
+0.07%
JPXGY - HYHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
HKXCF - HYHDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
MCQEF - HYHDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAUSY - HYHDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCY - HYHDF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

IVTJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IVTJF and ITEX have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IVTJF and ITEX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVTJF
1D Price
Change %
IVTJF100%
N/A
ITEX - IVTJF
25%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
SLNH - IVTJF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.38%
HYHDF - IVTJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
HKXCF - IVTJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
MAUSY - IVTJF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More