HYAC
Price
$11.17
Change
+$0.04 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
307.89M
TLGYF
Price
$14.71
Change
+$0.57 (+4.03%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
132.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYAC vs TLGYF

Header iconHYAC vs TLGYF Comparison
Open Charts HYAC vs TLGYFBanner chart's image
Haymaker Acquisition
Price$11.17
Change+$0.04 (+0.36%)
Volume$2.68K
Capitalization307.89M
TLGY Acquisition
Price$14.71
Change+$0.57 (+4.03%)
Volume$8.36K
Capitalization132.14M
HYAC vs TLGYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HYAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYAC vs. TLGYF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYAC is a Buy and TLGYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HYAC: $11.17 vs. TLGYF: $14.72)
Brand notoriety: HYAC and TLGYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYAC: 1% vs. TLGYF: 127%
Market capitalization -- HYAC: $307.89M vs. TLGYF: $132.14M
HYAC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $307.89M. TLGYF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $132.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLGYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HYAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLGYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLGYF is a better buy in the long-term than HYAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLGYF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TLGYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TLGYF is a better buy in the short-term than HYAC.

Price Growth

HYAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while TLGYF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HYAC($308M) has a higher market cap than TLGYF($132M). TLGYF YTD gains are higher at: 26.418 vs. HYAC (3.714). HYAC has more cash in the bank: 206K vs. TLGYF (40.6K). HYAC has less debt than TLGYF: HYAC (273K) vs TLGYF (1.29M).
HYACTLGYFHYAC / TLGYF
Capitalization308M132M233%
EBITDAN/A-1.73M-
Gain YTD3.71426.41814%
P/E RatioN/A36.52-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash206K40.6K507%
Total Debt273K1.29M21%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYACTLGYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
13%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNCRY36.220.32
+0.89%
UniCredito Spa
CFPUF0.50N/A
N/A
Canfor Pulp Products, Inc.
PREIF0.07N/A
N/A
Precipitate Gold Corp
TIAJF0.44N/A
N/A
Telecom Italia S.p.A.
BTRCF12.94N/A
N/A
BETTER COLLECTIVE A S

HYAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYAC has been loosely correlated with TLGYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYAC jumps, then TLGYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYAC
1D Price
Change %
HYAC100%
+0.36%
TLGYF - HYAC
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.99%
VMCUF - HYAC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGAAF - HYAC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACT - HYAC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
BAYA - HYAC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TLGYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLGYF has been loosely correlated with KACUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLGYF jumps, then KACUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLGYF
1D Price
Change %
TLGYF100%
+3.99%
KACUF - TLGYF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HYAC - TLGYF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
MANDF - TLGYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILXP - TLGYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKU - TLGYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
More