Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs WCMJX
HWVZX vs WCMJX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs WCMJX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.12
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets783.01M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Investor
Price$11.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.79M
HWVZX vs WCMJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. WCMJX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Buy and WCMJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWVZX has more cash in the bank: 783M vs. WCMJX (21.8M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than WCMJX: HWVZX (0.87) vs WCMJX (0.00). HWVZX was incepted earlier than WCMJX: HWVZX (6 years) vs WCMJX (6 years). WCMJX (1.70) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.78). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. WCMJX (15.00). WCMJX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: WCMJX (1000) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.26 vs. WCMJX (-21.05). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 46.09 vs. WCMJX (21.44).
| HWVZX | WCMJX | HWVZX / WCMJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.15 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.70 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.623 | -5.772 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 783M | 21.8M | 3,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.26 | -21.05 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.54 | 15.26 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.09 | 21.44 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement