Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs WCMFX
HWVZX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs WCMFX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.25
Change-$0.14 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets803.73M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$10.89
Change-$0.14 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4M
HWVZX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Buy and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWVZX has more cash in the bank: 804M vs. WCMFX (7.41M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: HWVZX (0.89) vs WCMFX (0.00). HWVZX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: HWVZX (6 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.78). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). WCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: WCMFX (100000) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.81 vs. WCMFX (-24.81). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 34.26 vs. WCMFX (15.14).
| HWVZX | WCMFX | HWVZX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.90 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.45 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.568 | -7.930 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 804M | 7.41M | 10,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.81 | -24.81 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.93 | 5.15 | -96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.26 | 15.14 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement