Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.33M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. HWVZX (831M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.86) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.78). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.32 vs. SSGSX (-2.42). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 23.80 vs. SSGSX (-0.63).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.23 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.23 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.653 | -1.723 | -212% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 831M | 5.13B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.48 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | -2.42 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.86 | 0.45 | 2,609% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.80 | -0.63 | -3,750% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers