Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$11.35
Change-$0.24 (-2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets724.46M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. HWVZX (724M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.97) vs SSGSX (0.52). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.76). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.48 vs. SSGSX (-8.36). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.75 vs. SSGSX (21.72).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.873 | -8.400 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 724M | 5.63B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.52 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.48 | -8.36 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.84 | -3.90 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.75 | 21.72 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement