Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.81
Change+$0.20 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.22M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. HWVZX (833M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.86) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.78). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.00 vs. SSGSX (-13.68). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.89 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.597 | 0.582 | 447% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833M | 5.18B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.48 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.00 | -13.68 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.45 | -7.65 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.89 | 4.92 | 546% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement