Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.25
Change-$0.14 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets803.73M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. HWVZX (804M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.49). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.78). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.81 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 34.26 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.568 | -0.129 | -440% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 804M | 5.23B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.49 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.81 | -12.62 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.93 | -6.25 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.26 | 8.71 | 393% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement