Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.12
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets783.01M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. HWVZX (783M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.87) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.78). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX (-8.26) and SSGSX (-8.48) have marching annual gain over last year. HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 46.09 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.623 | -1.034 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 783M | 5.31B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.48 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.26 | -8.48 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.54 | 1.10 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.09 | 18.06 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers