Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.62
Change+$0.12 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets807.97M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.75
Change+$0.49 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. HWVZX (808M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.85) vs SSGSX (0.47). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.76). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.29 vs. SSGSX (-4.89). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 71.60 vs. SSGSX (31.67).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.435 | 0.689 | 353% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 808M | 5.52B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.47 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.29 | -4.89 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.98 | 9.83 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.60 | 31.67 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement