Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.27
Change+$0.09 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets772.22M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. HWVZX (772M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.93) vs SSGSX (0.51). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.76). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.49 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 68.15 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.406 | -2.068 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 772M | 5.82B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.51 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | -1.26 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 2.38 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.15 | 29.33 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers