Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWVZX vs SSGSX
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWVZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z
Price$12.11
Change-$0.13 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets787.83M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
HWVZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWVZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWVZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. HWVZX (788M). HWVZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWVZX (0.92) vs SSGSX (0.50). HWVZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWVZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWVZX (0.76). HWVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWVZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWVZX (1000000). HWVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.18 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). HWVZX return over 5 years is better than : 48.01 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| HWVZX | SSGSX | HWVZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.705 | -2.025 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 788M | 5.5B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.50 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.18 | -5.53 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.65 | -9.76 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.01 | 15.88 | 302% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement