Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSZX vs SSGSX
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Z
Price$76.81
Change+$1.33 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets703.85M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. HWSZX (704M). HWSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSZX (1.06) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWSZX (0.89). HWSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSZX (1000000). HWSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.71 vs. SSGSX (-12.24). HWSZX return over 5 years is better than : 46.87 vs. SSGSX (3.18).
| HWSZX | SSGSX | HWSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.323 | 1.680 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 704M | 5.18B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.48 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.71 | -12.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.38 | -6.64 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.87 | 3.18 | 1,473% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers