Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSZX vs SSGSX
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Z
Price$77.50
Change-$0.08 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets791.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. HWSZX (792M). HWSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSZX (1.04) vs SSGSX (0.47). HWSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWSZX (0.86). HWSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSZX (1000000). HWSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). HWSZX return over 5 years is better than : 90.29 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| HWSZX | SSGSX | HWSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.533 | 2.046 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 792M | 5.64B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.47 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.71 | -1.56 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.40 | 3.97 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.29 | 22.95 | 393% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement