Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSZX vs SSGSX
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Z
Price$75.91
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets664.16M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. HWSZX (664M). HWSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSZX (1.06) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than HWSZX (0.89). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. HWSZX (41.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSZX (1000000). HWSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.13 vs. SSGSX (-2.93). HWSZX return over 5 years is better than : 45.94 vs. SSGSX (-0.61).
| HWSZX | SSGSX | HWSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.23 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.23 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.112 | -1.701 | -124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 664M | 5.12B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.48 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.13 | -2.93 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.16 | 0.24 | 7,699% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.94 | -0.61 | -7,496% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers